

Hmm… I’m confused. 35x seems wicked high. You mean if the project was 100 hours, and you would have made $10,000 as an in-house employee for that number of hours, you would pitch for $350,000, and be willing to accept $150,000?
The market decides what something is worth.
This is the part I struggle with, that meta-appreciation of the abstract concepts of “worth” and “market.” I haven’t learned how to believe that those things are real in the way that the person I’m “taking” money from is real.
There is no such thing as overcharging unless you’re charging people for something you don’t deliver.
This helps the above make more sense, though. Basically the question is: Did you do the thing you’re charging for? Did you do it well enough to justify the price? If so, you’re fine. It also assumes that the other person knows what fair market value is. I think my implicit assumption is that they don’t, and so I’m tricking them into paying more than they need to (even though I know that my prices are fair). Which is a bit condescending, now that I think about it.
How can the brand launch a marketing campaign without the brand knowing about it? Isn’t a fireworks display extremely expensive and logistically intensive?