• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    On the other hand, they were probably unchanged for decades. Did anything really change, or is this just a case of we need to remove 500k lines of code, what is most useless ? Let’s cut that.

    In other words, removed because it’s a KPI to remove lines, and this makes number go up.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Keeping code around isn’t free. Interfaces change, regressions pop up. You have to occasionally put in work just to keep it in a working state. Usually in cases like this there are discussions on the mailing list about who is going to maintain them and nobody volunteers. You can do that if you’re so passionate about keeping these drivers around.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They were fine all this time, what changed suddenly ? I bet it’s the security nerds stirring shit, making it all a liability and easier deleted than fixed.

    • saigot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So if it’s been unchanged for decades then you can just add it yourself and recompile the kernel. Elsewhere you argue that you can’t just add old drivers to a newer kernel, which implies these drivers require some nontrivial amount of maintaince. Which is it.