• NotAnArdvark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sounds like they’re suggesting most of the businesses they took money back from unintentionally claimed too much. They also said it was the third-parties who assisted with inaccurate claims that they’re most interested in. Considering these would be accountants there might actually be some consequences for them that aren’t just “bad application? That’s a fine.”

    Considering the chaos and immediate need that these programs were conceived under, I think that the approach of giving money as quickly as possible then following up when the dust settled was the right approach. Like the premise of our justice system - better that some dishonest people have money they don’t deserve temporarily than those in dire need go without.

    Also, do we know they’re not being charged interest?

    • Showroom7561
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering the chaos and immediate need that these programs were conceived under, I think that the approach of giving money as quickly as possible then following up when the dust settled was the right approach.

      I agree.

      The headline makes it seem like the CRA is scamming people, but really, they are just adjusting for the over-compensation given.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Now do criminal charges. Or I’m doing it next time around (motherfucking precedent, yo) I could always use the interest-free loan to get ahead, fuck.

    Edit: why the fuck do I ever play by the rules? Sure as hell isn’t doing me any favours

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rules were so unclear at first that even CRA agents were confused. Pretty hard to charge people for things they couldn’t possibly know were illegal/were told by governmental agents were legal.