morrowind@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoTrying Out & Benchmarking Bcachefs On Linux 6.7www.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkTrying Out & Benchmarking Bcachefs On Linux 6.7www.phoronix.commorrowind@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaremorrowind@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoThat startup time test seems a little sus for BTRFS
minus-squareProtonBadger@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoYes, it seems like there could be a weakness there, unless it’s just a fluke. The test has a background I/O load designed to stress BFQ I/O.
minus-squareChewy@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoYes, I’m surprised it is so bad considering btrfs was close to the other fs on most benchmarks.
minus-squarepiexil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s not just startup time, it’s startup time with heavy background I/O
That startup time test seems a little sus for BTRFS
Yes, it seems like there could be a weakness there, unless it’s just a fluke. The test has a background I/O load designed to stress BFQ I/O.
Yes, I’m surprised it is so bad considering btrfs was close to the other fs on most benchmarks.
It’s not just startup time, it’s startup time with heavy background I/O
Very much so.