• lightrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TekSavvy is the last remaining large internet wholesale provider, as others have been snapped up by bigger rivals in what independent ISPs describe as a challenging regulatory environment.

    Roughly half a dozen independent ISPs have been sold since February of 2022. According to BMO Capital Markets analyst Tim Casey, BCE Inc. paid roughly $139-million for Ebox, an internet, telephone and television service provider based in Longueuil, Que., and approximately $335-million for Ottawa-based Distributel last year.

    Telus, meanwhile, acquired Altima Telecom and Start.ca for undisclosed amounts, while Quebecor Inc. snapped up VMedia, an independent internet and television provider serving customers primarily in Toronto, in July of 2022. The price of the VMedia acquisition was also not disclosed.

    Montreal-based Cogeco Inc., meanwhile, paid $100-million for Oxio, a Montreal-based provider with 48,000 internet subscribers, Mr. Casey wrote in a research note…

    🤦🤦‍♀️🤦🏼‍♂️

    Sent an email to my MP. This is a competition issue similar to the Shaw sale to Rogers and the feds should get involved. You should do the same.

      • lightrush
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now we know how these competitors were able to offer cheaper deals than TekSavvy for the last couple of years. They were all acquired and their costs are now dramatically lower as a result of not having to pay wholesale costs.

        • floofloof
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The CRTC has been doing a fine job of driving small ISPs out of business and keeping the market closed to all but the biggest established players.

          After lowering rates in 2019, which immediately sparked lower internet prices across the country, the CRTC then astonishingly reversed its own decision and raised them back up again in 2021. And 8 years after saying they’d grant wholesale access to state-of-the-art fibre technology, it’s still not available to independent providers. Which means smaller ISPs simply can’t compete against those faster connections of the incumbents.

          https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2023/02/25/canadas-small-internet-providers-and-choice-are-dying-at-the-hands-of-ottawa-and-the-crtc.html

          • httpjames@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Minister Champagne always talks about how he wants ample competition, but we’ve yet to see any actual effective effort.

            • lightrush
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This might be a catalyst to a something being done. I sure hope so at least.

      • Woofcat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because none are independent. Reselling someone else’s network isn’t really a great position to be in.

    • thayer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ugh, this is so discouraging. I’m a big fan of Internet Lightspeed as an independent ISP (Vancouver area). I haven’t seen news of a buy-out for them yet, and I hope I never do.