• NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    “How much sawdust can you put in a Rice Krispy treat before people notice?”

    Answer: As much as they can legally get away with. If you’ve ever eated grated Parmesan cheese from the store, you’ve eaten sawdust. They list it on the can as “cellulose.”

    • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Sawdust is not (just) cellulose and cannot be listed as such on nutrition labels. Sawdust, i.e., wood shavings, contains many other compounds, especially lignin. Wood is refined by e.g. the Kraft process to separate the lignin from the cellulose, giving a suspension of cellulose fibers in water called “wood pulp.” I didn’t look, but I would imagine that calling wood pulp “cellulose” on a nutrition label is fine, 'cause that’s what it is.

      Now, none of this invalidates the crux of your argument that cellulose can be used as a cheap filler, such as in cheap “Parmesan cheese,” and no disagreement here that that shit is scummy af. However, there are some legitimate uses for smaller amounts in foods, such as anti-caking, thickening, and literal dietary fiber.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s all about companies putting things on the label that are technically true but deliberately misleading. For years, Kraft sold “100% Grated Parmesean cheese” that was nearly 8% cellulose. I assume their excuse if they got caught would be, “Well, our cheese is ‘100% Grated’ just like it says on the label.” Meaning, everything in the can WAS “100% grated” but it was NOT 100% cheese. The first reports on this were around 2015, but it looks like their more recent containers don’t have the word “100%” anymore. They’re constantly playing these stupid little word games with their customers.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        Money.

        Before the FDA, they used to put formaldehyde and cow brains into milk. It killed children and they knew it killed children, but they tried to tell people it actually made children stronger and that we didn’t need the FDA.

        In the vast majority of cases, every step we’ve taken away from libertarianism has been a huge improvement.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          So would sand and talc powder. Diamond dust.

          It’s cheap and doesn’t hurt you. There are more food like things that will fix it that are more expensive.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Cellulose from wood is literally a dietary fibre. Just like that good healthy fibre you are getting from kale. Which is also mostly cellulose. There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

            • Bgugi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t think it’s fair to say kale and cellulose are basically the same.

              I’d much rather eat cellulose.

            • htrayl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yup, actually cellulose in food is not a problem at all in my mind, and is probably actually improving the average Americans health if anything.

            • kase@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

              Be careful now, say something like that and someone might start a weird fad diet

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well there is right? Kale has other macro and micro nutrients, unlike you’re referring to the Fibre part only, then there would be no different right?

            • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              What? Does sawdust have high levels of vitamins A, B6, C, K, folate, fiber, carotenoids and manganese? The last time i checked it doesn’t.

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                We’re talking about fibre here. If anything, pure cellulose is better than kale.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just like you can get away with eating cellulose from other plants. It’s usually called fibre and everyone likes fibre.

      • GreenM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        it’s not harmful so i guess as long they print it on the can it’s just unethical but not yet illegal.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because it’s kinda-sorta edible (you won’t die from eating it) and it makes a cheap filler.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not filler, it’s an anti-clumping agent to make sure your cheap cheese shakes out of the can correctly every time.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Right. And they use as much “anti-clumping agent” as they think they can get away with.

            It’s filler. Because it’s cheaper than the advertised product.