Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I’m not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s the old Microsoft strategy again - Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

    They deserve a good boot up the arse before they put one up our’s.

  • ataraxia937@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

  • t0fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m trying to get away from Facebook and meta. I’d rather they weren’t remotely near me at all

    • axellenium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Exactly my thoughts, I don’t trust meta or zucky’s leadership, their motives will always be profit over everything else

    • masterspace@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Meta is more likely to pull people away from Twitter than Mastodon is, and having all of Twitter be run with ActivityPub / open to federation is a good thing.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    we shouldnt let them in. they would have done decentralized service years ago if there was money in it for them. They either want us to stop or try to seize control in only way that can -> by worming in.

    We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

    • masterspace@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

      As long as servers cost money to run, corporations will need to be involved.

      At a fundamental level, it’s either

      a) run by donations as a non profit, but as we’ve seen from wikipedia it will be a constant struggle to have enough money to last indefinitely (especially since Reddit / kbin / lemmy cost a lot more to run than Wikipedia)

      b) run by subscriptions, which will greatly limit growth, reach, search engine optimization, etc.

      c) run by advertising in which case corporate ad networks (like the kind that Meta runs) will need to be involved or

      d) have instances that are government run / paid for, but it would be difficult to accomplish on a global scale and may come with restrictions that not everyone is happy with

      It sucks but those are pretty much the only four options for running a digital community that requires paid servers and hosting space. Either corporations or some large government organization are going to have to be involved.

      • JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        About your first point, I’ve heard that Wikipedia is actually very wealthy and doesn’t need the money. They essentially run a scam every year asking for more.

        • bric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t understand why everyone freaks out that wikipedia tries to keep a reserve. Yes, they have enough money on hand to run for a few years… Is that really such a bad thing? Why does everyone think nonprofits should be scrimping by before they do their next donation campaign?

          To me, keeping a reserve fund just seems like good money management, and I’d rather donate to an organization that manages their money well than one that doesn’t. If there were problems with a large chunk of donations not going to wikipedia upkeep it would be different, but as far as I can tell all of the controversy is just over the fact that they have a reserve at all

          • JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            The biggest problem is the fact they beg for donations and the wording makes it seem like they are about to shut down unless you donate right now. They are disingenuous.

            No one said having reserve funds is bad. Just don’t act like you’re about to shut down Wikipedia to get more money when you literally have millions in reserve. It’s scummy.

  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go “Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$”. Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg’s gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

    I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

  • Zuberi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I say we just don’t allow them on most kbin/lemmy instances. Let the people decide what info is bullshit or not.