How long do you think it will take before Trump violates the order?

    • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To avoid a First Amendment fight. Generally speaking, gag orders are on less sure footing than most people realize; they really do run up against prior restraint concerns. There’s actually a fair amount of legal debate over them but the vast majority of defendants don’t have the wherewithal, or a compelling reason, to really fight them; Trump does. So judges are likely leery of issuing too broad a gag order on him for fear of being overturned, which they never want anyway, and thereby setting a precedent that weakens all judges’ ability to issue future gag orders.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for this explanation. I think it is important context to the discussion that needs to be spread far and wide so everyone better understands the legal calculus rather than getting mad because they think the judicial system is taking it easy on him.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The judicial system is taking it easy on him because he’s rich* and powerful and will throw a tantrum whatever happens.

          Here’s a Tennessee judge who has prohibited these people from discussing their case at all or sharing the footage they obtained legally on cases that have been dismissed.

          https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/09/27/coffee-county-judge-denies-request-by-georgia-man-to-share-footage-of-traffic-stop/

          Thousands of gag orders are issued from the bench that nobody hears about because there aren’t news reporters covering every courtroom in the country. Trump is getting special treatement because our justice system is inherently unjust.

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know the judicial system is taking it easy on him.

          AG Garland can go on TV 1000 more times and tell me he treats all cases equally, it’s still a lie.

          • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is still internal politics in apolitical institutions. You are shitting on Merrick Garland for taking the measured approach, but to do anything else would simply add further fuel to the fire of the vindictive psycopathy of the christo-fascist cult. The right way to exhume Donald Trump from politics is through the slow, methodical, dispassionate legal process of boiling him alive on full public display until he finally breaks.

            This was only ever going to work via imploying the “death by a thousand cuts” war-gaming that we are seeing. If you thought it was ever going to work via shock and awe or judicial blitzkrieg then you are beyond naive. If you are results oriented rather than emotionally motivated then I would think you could see that rather than yelling about some perceived lack of balls & strikes justice that does not exist in the real world.

            • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Garland deliberately obstructed any investigation into Trump (or speaking his name out loud in front of him) over J6 until the Hutchinson testimony humiliated both the FBI and him.

              As much as people would like to pretend he didn’t, Garland sandbagged like hell to protect Trump. Reporting is that it was because he didn’t want to seem political.

              And it’s really past time to encourage appeasement of MAGA rage. They will be angry regardless. There is no “right way” to behave that they will accept.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They apparently realize the implicit dangers of making a martyr out of a moron. It seems like the prevailing wisdom is to continue to give him enough tether to hang himself. For the record, I’m not sure I necessarily agree with that strategy, but I do understand it.

      • remotelove
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I have seen, judges can do whatever the fuck they want in regards to a case and especially in their own courtroom.

        • Brudder Aaron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. Only because it’s Trump and his massive cult of sycophants that they are using baby gloves with him.

          Wish they had the balls to actually treat him like they would literally any other criminal. But I guess its better to try to avoid another Jan. 6th.

          • remotelove
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In some sick way, I would like to see them attempt another “rebellion”. There absolutely won’t be a minimal police force waiting for them this time around. Seeing those idiots go up against a proper riot force might be interesting to watch.

            However, I understand that the risks outweigh the potential entertainment value. No more lives need to be lost or destroyed over this garbage.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The judge always has a duty to avoid appellate issues and therefore judges tend to be very lenient to make sure this case is done for good at the end of the court process.

      And just because ppl say this is a trump thing, NO. Sam Bankman-Fried, is one of a lot of other prominent cases where they have been swaths of leniency as well.