• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure glad we developed technology just to avoid paying one person to drive that truck. This is progress and will not have knock on consequences. We should celebrate this.

    • hakase@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This, but unironically. Automation is a good thing, and every driver who loses their job over this drives the necessity of finding post-automation solutions that much closer to the breaking point.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yes, I’m sure our current socioeconomic systems will get right on finding post automation solutions. That’ll happen real soon now. I mean, it’ll have to happen, right? We won’t just let all the jobs dissolve away so that shareholders get richer, right? That would be crazy to do that. I can’t imagine a society that would possibly do that, could you?

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This but realistically it has ruined equality at the rate time as it improved life quality

      • ColdWater
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes because losing your job to robots is fun, rich will be richer and poor will be more miserable