Proton is considering recycling old email addresses that still receive misdirected mail and appear in breach data, raising serious privacy concerns.

  • popcar2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 months ago

    What a stupid, nothingburger article.

    The company is considering releasing millions of old email addresses that were originally created by bots in its early years. These accounts were disabled almost immediately, but the addresses lived on. […] The problem is that many of these addresses are extremely common.

    So what? The author rambles about the horrors of getting emails from people who have accidentally written in a generic email handle. It’s not a huge deal. Tons of people using other email services like Outlook and Gmail also have generic usernames, it’s a user’s choice on whether to get one or not. These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade, so it’s not like somebody would send emails assuming it was the old person using the handle.

    Proton says it wants community feedback, which is good, but the fact that it is even considering such a reckless idea makes me question the company’s judgment.

    “I’m mad that the company is surveying their community”, great argument.

    • Jason2357
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have never heard of an email provider that will hold your address for you forever, paid or free. This post makes no sense.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        My Hotmail and Yahoo! accounts from the late 90s are still good and I don’t touch them but maybe once every year or two.

    • MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      One slip-up and the same will happen to your custom domain - someone will snatch it and get all your email addresses. This is what I am terrified about, sometimes life gets busy, you will miss the domain renewal and bye bye.

  • bitcrafter@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am confused about how this differs significantly from someone mistyping their e-mail address so that they end up instead typing in someone else’s active e-mail address, because in both cases e-mails get sent to the wrong person.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    nerds.xyz

    A great source of information if i ever saw one!

  • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I usually dont like to criticize art since there was real effort put by real people in it, but that doesnt apply to AI generated images

    This may be the most confusing, uninformative, boring image for an article i have ever seen

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there’s no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

    In terms of misdirected mail there are two types:

    1. Mistyped email addresses
      where a user has made a typo when entering their email somewhere
    2. Randomly typed email addresses
      where a user entered a random email when signing up for a service they didn’t care about

    Both of these can affect any existing email address (so proton’s plans make no difference), and only type 1 could be a privacy risk.

    Email addresses aren’t secret, nor are they personally identifiable (unless they contain your name or are linked with other personal information) so I don’t see a problem here.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t the security risk be that if someone thinks the old user is still using that email address, or forgets, they may mistakenly send sensitive into to the person who now has the address…?

      Am I missing something?

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        The previous owners were bots and the accounts were deactivated by proton shortly after registry

      • popcar2@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Have you read the article? These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade. It’s in the very first line.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope, I didn’t, thank you for correcting me :)

          I’m a lot better about reading the article than I used to be but sometimes I still don’t and just wanna chat about stuff with folks, and in this case that’s my bad

    • example@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there’s no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

      this is just completely wrong. obviously Proton wouldn’t grant access to existing mails, but the new owner of the address will still receive new emails intended for the previous owner. this is where the main risk lies.

      there are most likely accounts with various services attached to these email addresses. you can discover some via data breaches, some via emails they send to you, and some you might discover via trial and error. it might even just be a service telling you that am account already exists when you try to sign up.

      combine that with most services allowing account recovery by just using email, even for the services without publicly leaked passwords, you will be able to easily recover access to the accounts and in many cases get access to sensitive information.

        • example@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          granted, that reduces the risk of real sensitive information being attached to linked accounts, but i’d still not be surprised if there are some accounts attached to them elsewhere if they didn’t get banned prior to receiving their first email.

          i gotta admit i didn’t read the source earlier though, and i agree with your points in general for bot accounts if they have been banned before being used.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    can’t believe a company run by andy yen, who is buddy buddy with the us government, would do something like this.