Changes

Since our last release in February, we’ve had ~150 commits to Lemmy. The biggest changes, as we’ll outline below, are a split of Lemmy’s user tables into federated and local tables, necessitating a v3 of Lemmy’s API, federated moderation, i18n support in join.lemmy.ml, and lots of back-end cleanup.

Lemmy Server

General

  • Rewrote config implementation, finally allowing us to use newer Rust versions.
  • Removed categories.
  • Various refactors.

API

Federation

  • It is now possible to add users from other instances as community mods.
  • Federating Matrix ID.
  • Many changes for better compatibility with ActivityPub standard.

Database

  • Split the user_ into person and local_user tables.
  • Strictly typed commonly used ID columns, to prevent DB errors using i32 as ids.
  • Strictly typed URL fields, thanks to ajyoon.
  • Created default DB forms, now used in all the unit tests.

Lemmy UI

  • Now using utf-8 emojis.
  • Support for all the above changes to Lemmy.
  • Typescript-safe i18n strings, thanks to @shilangyu.
  • Added expandable post text (click on open book icon).
  • Prettier cross-posting, which does smart quoting.
  • Bugfixes for restoring scroll position on post page, custom site favicons, and autocomplete for login fields.

Lemmy Docs

join.lemmy.ml

  • Rewrote in inferno isomorphic, added i18n support via weblate.
  • Added a section on the support page thanking contributors.
  • Changed some page urls / titles

Upgrade notes

Important: there are multiple breaking changes:

  • Configuration via environment variables is not supported anymore, you must have all your config in the lemmy.hjson file ( except for LEMMY_CONFIG_LOCATION ).
  • The config format for allowed_instances and blocked_instances has changed, and you need to adjust your config file manually:
    • before: allowed_instances: ds9.lemmy.ml,enterprise.lemmy.ml
    • now: allowed_instances: ["ds9.lemmy.ml", "enterprise.lemmy.ml"] , and only one of the allowed_instances or blocked_instances blocks can be set.
  • The API has been upgraded from v2 to v3, so all clients need to be updated: lemmy-js-client: 0.9.9 -> 0.10.0 .

If you’d like to make a DB backup before upgrading, follow this guide.

To upgrade your instance to v0.10.0, simply follow the instructions in the documentation:

Compilation time

v0.9.0 (Rust 1.47) v0.10.0 (Rust 1.47) v0.10.0 (Rust 1.51)
Clean 140s 146s 119s
Incremental 28s 22s 19s

Despite ongoing efforts to speed up compilation, it has actually gotten slower when comparing with the same Rust version. Only thanks to improvements in newer Rust versions has our build process gotten faster. This could be simply because we added more code, while Lemmy v0.9.0 had 22.4k lines of Rust, v0.10.0 has 23.8k (an increase of 6%).

v0.9.0 build graph:

v0.10.0 build graph:

We extracted the crates lemmy_api_crud and lemmy_apub_receive from lemmy_api and lemmy_apub, respectively, and renamed lemmy_structs to lemmy_api_common. In the second graph you can see how parts of the api and apub crates are now built nicely in parallel, speeding up builds on multi-core systems.

On the other hand, some crates have gotten much slower to compile, in particular lemmy_db_queries (6.5s slower), lemmy_apub (6.5s slower if we include lemmy_apub_receive). And lemmy_db_views is quite slow, just as before.

  • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 years ago

    Note for instance admins: if there is any problem in your config and Lemmy fails to load it, it will still try to start with the default config. This doesnt work, and throws a lot of database connection errors, which may hide the original problem. So if you notice this, scroll up to the beginning of the log, and it should show you whats wrong in the config. We are gonna release v0.10.1 soon to fix this.

    • Zalamander@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      Aha, thanks. This might explain the gateway errors I experienced when trying to build using the 10.0.0 image.

      I also notice that the docker-compose file still points to the lemmy-ui 0.9.9 - should I build using that version, or should I upgrade my UI image to the 10.0.1?

      Last thing - if I pull the released lemmy and lemmy-ui tags (10.1.1) from github now and build my images from those, should those work fine? Or are these untested development versions?

      • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        I also notice that the docker-compose file still points to the lemmy-ui 0.9.9 - should I build using that version, or should I upgrade my UI image to the 10.0.1?

        Sorry, they should be identical. We’ll have this fixed soon. 0.10.0 is the correct version, although sometime within a few hours we’ll do a deploy for 0.10.2 which should have a few more fixes.

      • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        Which docker-compose file do you mean? In general you should always use the same version for lemmy and lemmy-ui (or at least the same minor version 0.9 vs 0.10, because there are breaking changes). 0.10.1 is fine to run, but tests are failing, which will be fixed shortly.

  • Metawish@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 years ago

    Exciting! I figured when Lemmur wouldn’t open there must have been some major change

  • someone@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 years ago

    I hoped this release would be called 1.0, oh well we are going with the NewPipe version naming scheme I guess :)

    • shilangyu (lemmur)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      I’m pretty sure Lemmy adheres to semver (which is a popular versioning scheme). As the name suggests, versions are “semantic”, so they convey a meaning: the 1.0.0 release will be the one where Lemmy can be called stable, afaik this is still far ahead.

  • Admiral Arjun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    i have a doubt. Say i wish to create a independent site where people can come and post stuffs, create their community, etc… is lemmy right for this?