• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      So 10 years on, what’s the result? Did it work out the way they hoped?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 days ago

          The main takeaway for me is that apparently they didn’t actually get the first beaver release done until October 2023. Assuming it’s the same plan this post was talking about in 2015, that’s eight fucking years of bureaucratic red tape just to get to a couple of tiny pilot projects (28 beavers total).

          I can’t say I’m surprised, just disappointed.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 days ago

            Tbf, they had been considered a pest species by farmers, and we also had a drought and a bunch of wildfires, so maybe not just bureaucratic red tape. They suspect at least one colony was messed up by humans. But another one left a good beginning of a dam and den, so the next batch will find a fixer-upper to live in instead of having to build from scratch while dodging coyotes and pumas or whatever.

          • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            I could’ve started a beaver farm and let a bunch of those little shits loose in that time and I don’t know jack shit about raising beavers. (Partial sarcasm)

  • d00ery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    The UK has also been trialling this, and of course the farmers are moaning about it.

    Conservationists call beavers “ecosystem engineers” because of how they redesign where they live. The dams they build slow the flow of rivers and streams and create habitats where other creatures can thrive. They’ve also been credited with reducing flooding further downstream.

    the National Farmers Union … wants culling beavers to be an option if they prove disruptive.

    NFU Deputy President David Exwood said that while beavers could provide certain benefits, “we are concerned about the negative impacts beavers can have on productive farmland, as well as the management requirements, costs and risks involved”.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj3nn4rlxz5o

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’ve seen actual beavers in the colorado river which I still find funny because I’ve never seen them at home in canada where they are kind of a mascot animal.

    • Mycatiskai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Go on a satellite map and look for wetlands, bring binoculars and go to those wetlands, search for chewed stumps of small trees near water sources, you will likely find beavers.

    • Pyr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m in western Canada and although I’ve never seen a beaver in the wild I have seen a ton of beaver dams. They always amaze me with how impressive they are.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 days ago

      The context is that beaver is a euphemism for the vagina. Combine that with the headline in the post and it’s a joke.