• rgb3x3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no way Nintendo abandons the removable joycons. They’re such an important part of the switch experience.

      Literally all Nintendo needs to do is release essentially the same hardware format with increased computing power, better screen, and a bit more “robustness” in the hardware (the OG feels plasticy and flexes quite a lot).

      They’d sell it probably as much as the original. Because BOTW and TOTK deserve higher graphical output.

      • Spuddlesv2
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Switch Lite doesn’t have removable controllers. So yes way they already did.

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          They did as a side product, but that’s not at all the same thing as dropping the concept entirely.

      • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no way Nintendo abandons the removable joycons.

        Nintendo abandoned the dual screen, and that was an incredible feature, I totally see them abandoning removable controllers

        • sim_@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tbf, they tried dual screen with a console and it flopped (for various reasons). With the switch acting as both a console and handheld device, I can see why they dropped dual screens.

          • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Neither the DS nor the 3DS flopped, on the contrary. the DS was the most sold console in the world

            And it gave us new experiences, new ways to play and also made some stuff better (like having extra info, like maps, information or access to the inventory, having that meant you didn’t need to pause the game)

            • Arkham@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              I believe by dual screen + console + flop they meant the dual screen setup the Wii U had.

            • sim_@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              For sure, I’m not saying the DSs flopped. But with Nintendo dropping a dedicated handheld line, I can see one of the main features of that handheld line went with it, especially when that feature was unsuccessful in a console format.

        • tombuben@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dual screen was a great feature with a handheld with two tiny screens. They tried it with WiiU on the home console and it was a massive failure. The Switch maybe doesn’t have dual screens, but the single screen is bigger than even the 3ds screens combined and they managed to port almost all WiiU exclusives to it with minimum loss of functionality.

          Maybe the revolutionary feature was the added screen real estate the dual screens allowed for instead of there just being two screens.

        • LyD
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          TotK barely works on a Steam Deck, why do people say this?

            • LyD
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Can you explain how it’s better on the Deck than the Switch?

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Including a mock like this to illustrate an article is really dishonest