• Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hoping someone might be able to help me out with this info, I’ve tried looking and can’t find a solid answer.

    When you use the “Save and close group” feature of tab groups, do they

    1. Stay forever, no matter if you close Firefox, restart your pc, not used that group in months etc.

    2. Allow an unlimited, or at least a high number, of saved and closed tab groups.

    I mainly ask because it specifically puts closed and saved tab groups in a section called “recent tab groups” which sounds suspiciously temporary.

  • nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Me using the Tiled Tab groups add-on for 2 years now… Good-morning

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is mostly useless to me; I already enforce all tabs into unique containers to isolate browsing and website contexts from one another; while still allowing me to make exceptions to the rule and “unbreak” things if that’s causing an issue, but still keeping things isolated from the rest of the browsing.

    As for Tab Management; I use two windows and a plugin; Tab Stash Plus; which collapses tabs I stash into a bookmark.

    Every so often when I reach a critical mass of tabs I personally go through them and play “Keep/Toss” with more odds on Toss. Only useful tabs get stashed and are then searchable from the plugin.

    In general; since this feature now presents a possibility of an extremely UNWANTED AI integration I will be setting the config to off and leaving it off…using a relevant config policy tool or plugin to enforce this to off if needed. I hate AI features that I didn’t ask for and this one definitely doesn’t seem like it’s going to be helpful nor compatible with my current workflow.

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    “You asked, we built it” --> “People keep shitting on us for our terrible decisions… Quick let’s do something people actually want to compensate ! Wait let’s also slap AI on it, I’m sure everyone will love that” (Mozilla being Mozilla I guess…)

    • vivendi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      People love to hate on Mozilla without knowing shit. Some of it is literally 4Chan grade manipulation as well.

      Like the whole ToS debacle. People just aren’t interested in truth just rage 24/7

  • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    So they’re reintroducing a feature in 2025 that they added to Firefox in 2010 and subsequently removed in 2013. Such progress. Much wow.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Noooo it has AI garbage, what the hell.

    I really need this feature, I have over 500 tabs open right now, I just hope it works well.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah pretty sad. It would be a much more useful feature for me on mobile.

      On desktop, I usually just create a new window for different types of stuff.

      No easy way to organize my infinite tabs on mobile (as far as im aware).

      Chromium browsers on mobile do this, but it’s also a bit weirdly complicated/frustrating to work with at times, I hope of Firefox get to it, they can make it super simple.

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The folks over on IOS are waiting very patiently for extension support. Firefox folks taking their time.

  • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

    Yeah sure ok. Did the community ask for this too?

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean, why not?

      They integrated accessibility focused, local, AI pretty well.

      Loads of folks bitched about it because they were triggered by “AI”, but it’s essentially invisible, as it should be.

      I hate naming things, that’s actually something AI is good at, hell yeah, let it name my shit for me please.

      Then again, these communities are always full of Debby downers who hate on everything.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        [Dr. Who meme format]

        Is AI bad?

        It Depends. Large corporate AI hosted at a data centre that consumes a nuclear reactor’s worth of power and a lake’s worth of water for cooling for the purpose of generating slop stolen from Artists and Writers? Yes.

        Locally run embedded AI designed for a specific task to automate small processes or enhance the UI experience with little cost to local computing resources because it’s been properly optimised? No.

        • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          a datacenter is more efficient than lots of smaller individual computers doing calculations independently. They actually make their stuff as efficient as possible, otherwise it hurts margins. So, if you’re against datacenter AI because of power, then just stop using ai. If everyone ran locally, the efficiency would be significantly worse overall.

          I actually hate what llms have become, but efficiency is still not a good way to compare a datacenter to a home computer.

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            A consumer would use a lower token AI compared to large datacenters. I am sure it does less environmental damage, because the home user doesnt need tap water for cooling.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah for now I remain cautiously optimistic. I have not used their ai stuff once but it was also never shoved down my throat and my browsing experience has not been affected at all, and them finally listening to the community and implementing tabs grouping is just great. If they keep it that way I think we’ll be fine

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t care about AI when it’s doing minor things like this it’s when they’re shoving it down our throats and we don’t want it.

    • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      For one second I thought Mozilla might have made something that wasn’t anti-feature… But OF COURSE it’s going to need to have AI 😑

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    ok, mozilla is at least doing stuff we want along with ai garbage now.

    • pory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thankfully, the useful changes trickle downstream to Waterfox, LibreWolf, Floorp, etc.

      • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seems like it creates bills, but also has enough hype behind it to generate investment/donation interest.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          At least the AI runs locally, as opposed to sending everything to someone else’s computer for processing. Local translation in Firefox actually works quite well.

  • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    Shit, I remember seeing requests for tab groups for like 20 years under an assortment of names and descriptions. Neat to see. Useless for me, but neat to see.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a nice feature when you have a group of multiple sites you need quick access to on the regular. For me, I manage around 12 websites in three environments ; dev, test, and prod. Being able to group the websites by environment keeps things organized and somewhat readily available at two clicks (maybe three if you count collapsing a group before opening another group).

    • PostaL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Now, the team is experimenting with smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

      I bet you one cheap bottle of mineral water they’ll implement this like tomorrow

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not on my browser they aren’t. They just started offering to make groups one day, and while I want to tear out someone’s tongue for it, it would require far too much effort, and might just be a bit of an overreaction.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Was I signed up for some beta? I’ve had firefox groups for a few weeks now.

    And holy shit do I need em.

      • Prontomomo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        A/B testing a very effective mass testing ground, I’m surprised some people don’t do it. Amazon is probably doing a few dozen a/b tests constsntly

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Now, the team is experimenting with smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

    Off course, they found a way to integrate more Ai features.

    • Lodra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the inclusion of some small AI feature is what justified the rest of this work being done. As in, someone got approval for tab groups only because they were smart enough to describe it as “AI powered tab groups“. Just speculation