How is this contradicting what I said? And (some of) the rest of the world is taking a neutral stance which is a purely utilitarian position and says nothing about what sympathies they have for either side.
P.S. the colonizers in this case are clearly the Russians. That is a historic fact.
All your support for the war is achieving is ensuring that thousands of people die and that we live in a more dangerous world driving us towards the end of human civilization and possible human extinction. This is what you are doing.
The tiny percentage of the world population living in the west wants to have a hegemony over the entire planet and is willing to risk a nuclear holocaust to achieve that. Anarchists are firmly at the forefront of that.
You need to lay off the Russian propaganda. The nonaligned states explicitly have a neutral stance and urge both sides to enter peace negotiations as soon as possible. This even includes China. That is not “supporting” Russia, who is clearly the aggressor and can chose to stop the war any time they want.
And I am not supporting the war, I am just realistic about what can be achieved and who is ultimately responsible.
You need to lay off the NATO propaganda. Everybody with a couple of brain cells to bang together understands why states don’t want to openly state a policy contrary to the west. However, China and India have been pretty open regarding whom they see as being at fault for the war. Expecting intellectual honesty from an anarchist is not something to be expected though.
Pretty open support? Read again the official Chinese statement you yourself linked here a few days ago, that is not support, that is urging the Russians to stop this madness.
The fact that you think that’s what it is shows just how detached from reality you are. China is literally discussing sending weapons to Russia right now, but yeah you keep on telling us that black is white. Hope NAFO pays you well.
The CIA has said they are discussing this. That is not a neutral source and clearly they have their own agenda in peddling these selective half-truths.
US literally stated they want to have a war with China over Taiwan if they can break Russia in Ukraine. China understands perfectly well what the plan is because US has said it openly and repeatedly.
How is an interview with the Russian ambassador and an US military analyst relevant to the question of if the Chinese are discussing to send weapons to Russia? As any large nation they are probably discussing a lot of things, but peddling that right now to the press is clearly NATO propaganda. Are you really so naive and not see that?
How is this contradicting what I said? And (some of) the rest of the world is taking a neutral stance which is a purely utilitarian position and says nothing about what sympathies they have for either side.
P.S. the colonizers in this case are clearly the Russians. That is a historic fact.
The rest of the world is not taking a neutral stance at all. In fact, the rest of the world is pretty openly supporting Russia and denouncing the west at this point. https://usrussiaaccord.org/acura-viewpoint-krishen-mehta-the-ukraine-war-viewed-from-the-global-south/
All your support for the war is achieving is ensuring that thousands of people die and that we live in a more dangerous world driving us towards the end of human civilization and possible human extinction. This is what you are doing.
The tiny percentage of the world population living in the west wants to have a hegemony over the entire planet and is willing to risk a nuclear holocaust to achieve that. Anarchists are firmly at the forefront of that.
You need to lay off the Russian propaganda. The nonaligned states explicitly have a neutral stance and urge both sides to enter peace negotiations as soon as possible. This even includes China. That is not “supporting” Russia, who is clearly the aggressor and can chose to stop the war any time they want.
And I am not supporting the war, I am just realistic about what can be achieved and who is ultimately responsible.
You need to lay off the NATO propaganda. Everybody with a couple of brain cells to bang together understands why states don’t want to openly state a policy contrary to the west. However, China and India have been pretty open regarding whom they see as being at fault for the war. Expecting intellectual honesty from an anarchist is not something to be expected though.
I think you’re both infected with the same brainworms but are refusing treatment.
if you say so
Pretty open support? Read again the official Chinese statement you yourself linked here a few days ago, that is not support, that is urging the Russians to stop this madness.
The fact that you think that’s what it is shows just how detached from reality you are. China is literally discussing sending weapons to Russia right now, but yeah you keep on telling us that black is white. Hope NAFO pays you well.
The CIA has said they are discussing this. That is not a neutral source and clearly they have their own agenda in peddling these selective half-truths.
Here’s what China’s actually saying in case you’re confused there
US literally stated they want to have a war with China over Taiwan if they can break Russia in Ukraine. China understands perfectly well what the plan is because US has said it openly and repeatedly.
How is an interview with the Russian ambassador and an US military analyst relevant to the question of if the Chinese are discussing to send weapons to Russia? As any large nation they are probably discussing a lot of things, but peddling that right now to the press is clearly NATO propaganda. Are you really so naive and not see that?