"Tesla secured a series of approvals from California required for a promised robotaxi service.

The California Public Utilities Commission said it approved Tesla’s application for a transportation charter-party carrier permit, a license typically associated with chauffeur-operated services, allowing the company to own and control a fleet of vehicles and transport employees on pre-arranged trips.

The permit is a prerequisite for applying to operate an autonomous ride-hailing service in California, but a CPUC spokesperson said the current permit “does not authorize them to provide rides” in autonomous vehicles, and does not allow Tesla to operate a ride-hailing service to the public."

  • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Can’t wait to see how TSLA stocks prices will react once people realize what an amazing target Musk’s own fleet will be for vandalism and public furor:D

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      not to mention all the Musky Bro-Hoes getting hurt because they trusted FSD when it most definitely was not self driving.

  • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Call for an uber, driverless tesla pulls up. Call a tow truck, don’t cancel the order. “Yeah hi, thanks for showing up. Yeah I dunno, it just pulled up here and it’s blocking my driveway.”

    • hddsx
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, don’t so that. Without cancelling, it looks intentional.

      Call uber, but put traffic cones everywhere. Cancel because it can’t make it. Call tow truck to report stuck Tesla.

  • uhmbah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    And now we have the “Wile E. Coyote carrier permit”…

  • Botzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    The CPUC is corporate bought and paid for (e.g. NEM 3.0).

    Absolute waste of space except that they’re the only speed bump to so many things. So I guess we’ve got that going for us.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would not trust a robo-taxi that relies entirely on cameras. It really does need lidar/radar and other sensors to work well.

    • Ele7en7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I find it hilarious that my vacuum has lidar and cameras to avoid obstacles, but Tesla can’t be bothered

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tesla used to have it, but they removed it since Elon Musk only wanted them to use cameras. They even went as far as to send a software update to older cars to disable the extra sensors and only use the cameras.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It helps, but humans function without LIDAR (though it can be helpful to them too). I am confident that it is technically possible to drive with just a camera, given sufficient image processing. Is our image processing in 2025 sufficient for the task? That I don’t know.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Have you seen the recent video where a tesla fell for a wile e. coyote wall?

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The issue isn’t image processing, but the logic of these systems. The algorithms/models running autonomous vehicles aren’t smart or flexible enough. The current type of systems just aren’t advanced enough.

        • pycorax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean I don’t like Tesla either and I agree that they should use Lidars but how is a Lidar supposed to solve this issue? It’s still a solid surface and the Lidar will still pick it up.

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s the entire point of Mark’s test, Tesla doesn’t use LIDAR anymore, just plain cameras. LIDAR wouldn’t be fooled by such a painted wall, but apparently typical cameras can indeed be fooled.

            It’s similar to facial recognition unlock, if it doesn’t use some form of 3D cameras or sensors, then just a simple photo of you is enough to unlock your phone.