Just randomly sharing my experience here. My sister told me a few weeks ago she was going to change for a new phone (a Motorola, she likes AOSP-like experience). I noticed that her new phone wouldn’t get a jack.

“Yeah, I know, I hope I can make it work with a USB-adapter”. She has nice headphones that she likes to use, so USB-C earplugs were not an option.

Fast forward to today, she told me the adapter she got starts to malfunction:

  • she has to twitch the jack in the adapter for the thing to work
  • when she plugs the adapter in, Google Assistant takes over and randomly starts skipping songs.

She’s now considering getting wireless earbuds, but she’s not a fan of having to recharge them to be able to use them, and is also cautious about the e-waste potential.

I have a Moto G84 which does the job. It’s not the best phone in the world, I’m eyeing a flagship from time to time and keep the G84 as a “connected walkman”, but would it break today, I would probably get a G55 (https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Moto-G55-smartphone-review-Inexpensive-doesn-t-have-to-be-boring.932900.0.html)

That’s it for me, do you have similar experiences to share?

  • ahal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    After experiencing true wireless ear buds, I’m never going back. Yeah no thanks, I don’t want to be literally tethered to my phone.

      • ahal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ok… Don’t think I said they couldn’t?

    • Albbi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I still have been able to play games on my phone with truly wireless earbuds because the latency is awful. I’d love to have an option to plug in.

        • Albbi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Google pixel 6 Pro with Google Buds Pro. Not really cheaped out but no aptx on the earbuds. I assumed low latency codec would be there when I bought a pro version of an earbud from a company that removes their headphone jack, but noooooooo.

          • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Google buds aren’t cheap but… They aren’t really a prime example or wireless earbuds. Basically just the equivalent of the air pods. Decent sound, but a solid middle ground in terms of features and quality.
            Take a look at some other options that do support aptx or at least Bluetooth LE Audio. Aim for BT 5.3 support, but BT 5.2 may be acceptable if you are happy with BT LE Audio latency.

            I use the Sony WF-1000XMS with BT LE Audio on the Steamdeck and the latency is fine for most gaming. Latexy seems to be around 30-100ms at my best estimation (depending on the quality and complexity of the audio being transmitted).
            But the WF-1000XMS don’t support aptx. There are lots of devices that do though. I’d recommend looking for aptx-ll specifically, but aptx-hd is also a massive improvement.

            As a side note, the reason I use WF-1000XMS is for the excellent ANC (I’m autistic), so I am not recommending them as gaming earbuds, but just as an example of quality earbuds that work for me.

    • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t have to go back. You can have both. A headphone jack does not preclude the use of Bluetooth.

    • Tabooki@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bluetooth can’t even transport mp3 quality. Let alone CD or even HD quality music.

      • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There is no “mp3 quality”, as that can vastly vary depending on bitrate. And what is HD quality music supposed to be? I bet you couldn’t reliably differentiate high quality mp3, CD audio and completely uncompressed wav in a series of blind tests.

      • ahal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not true. It depends on the codecs both devices use. But regardless, I mostly listen to podcasts and my hearing is by far the limiting factor in audio quality.