The 2024 US presidential election had been widely characterized as one of the most consequential political contests in recent US history. Although turnout was high for a presidential election – almost matching the levels of 2020 – it is estimated that close to 90 million Americans, roughly 36% of the eligible voting age population, did not vote. This number is greater than the number of people who voted for either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.

More than a month on from polling day, eligible US voters from across the country as well as other parts of the world got in touch with the Guardian to share why they did not vote.

Scores of people said they had not turned out as they felt their vote would not matter because of the electoral college system, since they lived in a safely blue or red state. This included a number of people who nonetheless had voted in the 2020 and 2016 elections.

While various previous Democratic voters said they had abstained this time due to the Harris campaign’s stance on Israel or for other policy reasons, a number of people in this camp said they would have voted for the vice-president had they lived in a swing state.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Lol this was a 1:1 repeat of 2016.

    I voted and sat back as the Dems threw away their election by willingly ignoring their constituents in exchange for AIPAC money.

  • 1985MustangCobra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So wait, if your state wins, the excess votes don’t matter towards the presidential candidate?

  • john89
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Pivoting from Biden to Harris guaranteed a Trump victory.

    We need a replacement for the democrat party.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Pivoting to Biden in 2020 is what really sank the party in 2024. Covid won 2020 for Biden, but he thought he was something special so in 2024 he desperately clung onto power until his mental decline was too obvious for even party diehards to deny and then the party scrambled to push through Harris who was forced to adopt that bonehead’s general rhetoric. Biden would’ve lost things even harder. The party really fucked itself with Biden, but I’m sure the party thinks it was all worth it to prevent a Bernie victory.

    • njaard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Harris overtook Biden’s polling numbers quite quickly. Also, I find that Biden’s pardoning of the “kids4cash” judge demonstrates some extreme incompetence and tone deafness".

    • hamFoilHat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Biden had been showing his age for almost a year before he dropped out. That debate was his last chance to show he wasn’t having a massive mental decline, and he failed. There was no way he could have won against Trump after that.

      • john89
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I actually disagree. I think the debate was blown way out of proportion and most people who would’ve voted for him prior would’ve still voted to him after.

        It’s important to acknowledge that there are a lot of liars on the internet. It’s easy to make it appear that a bunch of people jumped ship from biden after the debate when you see waves of trolls saying “yeah, I was gonna vote for Biden but not after that debate!” Meanwhile, they were going to vote for Trump all along.

        That said, I still don’t think Biden had a great shot at winning because he doesn’t serve the working class or exploit their emotions.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The idea that your vote doesn’t count in a strongly red or blue state is total propaganda to get people to not vote and make it so that they don’t have to spend money on campaigning in those places. There are way more people who don’t vote than there are people who voted for either candidate in most places. If everyone voted it could easily overcome any perceived majorities. Especially if city people voted. Problem is that there isnt enough capacity to vote. And cuts to funding that capacity in red states have been a big way to discourage voting in cities. Most people can’t afford to take an entire day off of work to wait in the lines and employers wouldn’t allow it. They’re only required to give 1 hour which is barely enough to get to a poling place and back with no lines. And that isn’t enforced so many don’t even give that hour. And mail in and early voting has been framed by Republicans as unreliable with fake movies and such as propaganda even though it works great in many Blue states.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well, they may have actual made it so about what they fear about their vote “not counting” by putting the fascists in power

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I live in a blue state but that doesn’t mean I’d be justified in believing that I should sit it out. Even if that insane logic about not needing to was valid, there’s other shit on the ballot. And even if my vote for or abstaining against an uncontested incumbent is irrelevant, there’s still ballot measures that need to be understood.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    All I got from this is that Democrats, progressives, and Americans are fucking absolutely stupid regardless of education level.

    • john89
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Why are you lumping progressives in with them?

      Trump won 2 presidencies because democrats actively work against progressive agendas which would actually benefit regular people.

      • njaard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Progressives work against progressive agendas by naming pro-safety policies like “don’t have police respond to mental health patients” as the Fox-news like “defund the police”.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, I feel like this last election was an awakening for me of exactly how stupid, selfish and ignorant this country is on average. This country is just dumb as shit and proud of it.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not voting takes less energy than voting for someone that doesn’t represent a potential voters interests. That’s not stupid, that’s just taking the path of least resistance.

      • john89
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Not really. There’s substantial evidence to indicate that voting does not significantly impact policy.

        I think people like you are just grasping at straws to avoid admitting that you put your faith in a failing process.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          The evidence isn’t that voting doesn’t affect things. That’s a moronic conclusion. Its that largely things the public wants are vetoed by corporate influence.

          The evidence is that voting affects things the corporate class is indifferent to- the easiest thing to point to is that the individual pet projects of candidates have an outsized effect: The invasion of Iraq being the easiest example of where the intention to create a war that hundreds of thousands died was essentially because the guy that won the 2000 election had a fixation.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    One guy said this “VP Harris failed to demonstrate she was ethically or intellectually capable of executing the office, repeatedly failing to detail out her policies…" It’s infuriating that people continue to believe Harris never detailed her policies despite the fact that all she talked about was policy. All they had to do was pay attention to her and she would talk about her policies, it seems like they just didn’t want to even pay attention to her. Or that because she didn’t detail alllll of her policies then that wasn’t enough. Add on that this person calls her intellectually incapable of talking about her policies, basically calling her stupid and it’s just exhausting.

    This whole article continues to make me believe in the fundamental problem with Democrat voters which so many people have shown. The democrats have to run the perfect candidate with the perfect policies or the charisma of Obama who promise the world, while the Republicans can run a guy who says immigrants are eating cats and dogs and because the Democratic candidate wasn’t perfect, the Republicans win.

    And then when the Democrats do promise signficant change and it doesn’t immediately happen, Democrat voters punish them for it, they lose the midterms, and any change that was in the process of happening gets stopped dead. But when Republicans promise the world and don’t deliver, Republican voters reward them for simply promising it.

    “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.”

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Institutional vs anti institutional. Dems are institutional and the institution sucks. Trump is a sledgehammer. He promised alot of sledgehammering. Not good, but that’s irrelevant. The Dems need to stop protecting the broken system of neo liberal economics that fucking Regan invented and chasing the phantom center right vote.

      Aka. swing left or die.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I didn’t find Harris compelling, just more of the same.

    Well you’re sure not going to get more of the same now. Good job, shithead.

    • john89
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Good job, shithead.

      Yeah, keep blaming the people “not falling in line” instead of just running a candidate that supports them.

      That’s how we got 2 Trump presidencies and people like you still haven’t learned from it.

      If anything, this should teach people like you that expecting people to “fall in line” no longer works and you should support different tactics to prevent further conservative blowouts.

      I don’t think people like you are capable of learning from this, though. You’re just going to get angrier and keep repeating the same mistakes expecting different results.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You’re right. I do blame people for “not falling in line” and letting a genocidal fascist dictator who made no secret of that gain control of a nation because they didn’t find the opposition “compelling.”

        And as far from not having learned, I think what you haven’t learned is that 2024 was the last real election in the U.S. in your lifetime.

        Harris lost. You got what you wanted. Be happy about it.

        • john89
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, you’re delusional and incapable of arguing in good faith.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            And yet I did not insult you.

            And if you think I’m delusional about what Trump is going to do, you’re in for a very rude awakening.

            • john89
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yeah. You’re too distracted by the other guy being the antichrist to focus on how democrats would rather have trump than a progressive in office.

              Until that culture changes, we shouldn’t expect our government to change.

              Clearly you’re doing your part in making sure things stay exactly the same, while somehow expecting different results.

              I think there’s a word for that, but I digress.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                You’re right. I’m “too distracted” by the fascist dictatorship to play what if.

                What part should I be doing? Insulting people on the internet? What else are you doing?

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      the problem is, we still gotta beat Trump.

      I dont think anyone knows if actual leftist messages will actually work, but holy shit it’s gotta be better than diet, no caffeine, low sodium fun size Bill Clinton Zero.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well when you get Biden pardoning a judge who literally took bribes to send kids to jail to benefit a for profit jail, I’d question how compelling the Democrats are.

      Instead of voting 3rd party and trying to change things, many Americans seems to be locked in a pointless argument over which party is the least shit.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe you shouldn’t worry about them being compelling when the alternative was fascism.

        How are you still arguing this?

        • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Because it is all a lie to cover up the truth. They want everyone to think of them as righteous, good, and caring. Hell, they want to think of themselves that way. But deep down they know it’s not quite true. There’s something they hate that is more important than what happens to anyone else, and even to themselves. I suspect that for a lot of them it’s extreme sexism… Sure, they are all for a female president. As long as she is perfect. Says everything perfect, does everything perfect, and it would really help if she had a penis too. Or maybe they didn’t want an Indian or another black person… Whatever it was it was more important than their so called support for the Palestinians, support for the Ukrains, hate of fascists and Nazis, ect ect…
          Whatever it was, the blood of the Palestinians, Ukrains, is a small price to pay… But whatever it is, it’s heinous and they know it. So, rather than admit to everyone, and even more importantly themselves, what they know is truly disgusting, they pretend that it was something that makes no sense. “She didn’t explain her policies, we didn’t like her policies on something even though her opponents were 100 times worse…”
          It’s a smoke screen for the truth. Intellectual Dishonesty. They are lying to us and themselves.
          At least the maga crowd has the guts to admit their hate. They come straight out and let you know that they are fine with the world burning as long as whatever they hate burns with it.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Well then I guess you’ve gotten what you wanted. Enjoy the Trump administration and the all new domestic genocides.

            • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’m not the guy you were responding to. I responded to your question about how he could still be arguing such an illogical argument.
              And to reiterate, his entire argument is a lie. It’s a smoke screen to hide the real reason he didn’t want to vote for a woman, or a brown person, or whatever his hang-up is.

            • kipo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Not all the people who didn’t vote for Harris are Trump supporters; there are a lot of leftists and progressives who believe that they can’t survive any more late-stage capitalism. They recognize that the only peaceful chance to stop the wealthiest 1% from ruling is to stop electing them and stop electing the people who are bought by them.

              Corporate democrats are better on certain social issues but they’ll still put wealth over people, and they’ll never move left. It’s why we have the cruel health system we have today. It’s why the banks got bailed out and never got regulated. It’s why the Digital Millennium Copyright Act passed. Heck, 81 Congressional house democrats just voted for a military spending bill that denies medical care to trans kids.

              Kamala Harris is a corporate democrat.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                And like I told the person before you, she lost so you got what you wanted. Enjoy the fascism and the genocides.

                • kipo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I actually voted both third party and for Harris, so maybe don’t assume you know how people voted or what they want.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          How you still did not understand that this way of arguing won’t change anyone’s mind?

          “Choose between slow sleepwalk to fascism or this rapid honest one”.

          I can’t fathom why people put all the blame on the voters. Dems could a and should have done more. Harris got billion dollars for her campaign!

          Biden pardoning his son is understandable, but a giant Fuck You to everyone else. He got his, now the rest will live with consequences.

          DNC has fucked the USA again and again. How about some blame there.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Most voters don’t have luxuries of having time or education to make deep dives into issues, and are swayed by some nonsense.

              And think what you like, it’s usually not something they choose voluntarily or consciously.

              I can’t fathom how people point out how ‘pulling yourselves up by the bootstraps’ is BS, and then they point to tired, underpaid, health issue ridden public and say: “you should know not to vote for this!!1!”.

              Then Harris panders to the right and the same people don’t understand how she could lose. Really?

              AOCs voters said they are tired of the status quo. Something we all know and understand. And we know the DNC will never let go of the status quo. Where does this lead to?

              • stetech@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Most voters don’t have luxuries of having time or education to make deep dives into issues, and are swayed by some nonsense.

                Arguably most voters wouldn’t have needed to take a deep dive into issues to see Trump was the worse option, a shallow one at most. A swim would’ve been enough, really.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                AOC’s voters said all sorts of insane, idiotic shit, when she asked why they voted for her but also Trump.

                It was trivially easy, and took very little time, to inform yourself about the two options. There is no excuse. People need to take responsibility for their decisions, and blaming everyone but themselves is just copium.

                • msage@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Those are the people you have to convince to vote, that’s all.

                  If you keep ignoring them, nothing will change.

                  This attitude is what brought the results. Ignoring masses to pander to billionaires is not going to win democrats anything. Pointing fingers to other side and announcing ‘we are better than them’ worked only once.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why would I care about changing anyone’s mind at this point? America is going to be a fascist dictatorship. Any sort of semblance of a free and fair election are over.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              By understanding the problem potential solutions may emerge.

              Doomerism helps the owner class, they need you to feel helpless and isolated. Don’t let them win.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                Do you know nothing about Project 2025? You’ve had a long time to learn about it. The whole point is to keep Republicans in power perpetually and remove any need for legitimate elections.

                And you think you can vote your way out of that?

                (By the way, I love how you’ve gone from “this sort of arguing won’t change anyone’s mind” to “why aren’t you trying to change people’s minds?!?!”)

                • msage@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Re:btw what do you mean? It’s the same thing: you should be trying to change people’s minds, and be better at that, and I’m bringing your attention to it. You are a prolific poster all over the fediverse, so you can have a big impact on people. And I think you are aware of it.

                  I’ve known about the P25 for a long time, I’m well aware of its consequences. Burying our heads and losing our hope is the only way they can get away with it.

                  Kings have fallen, and we all should do our best to not create them again. That includes understanding those who voted for them. Ignoring the problem or its root cause won’t change anything.

                  I keep repeating this line in my head:

                  The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    “The Dems are out of touch on social issues, and have tacked too far to the left to appease a minority of progressives.”

    Asshole.

    • john89
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Progressivism is further-left than liberalism.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      For those who aren’t aware already, “a minority of progressives” means “queer people,” specifically trans people.

      This asshole is saying the Dems went too far in trying to make things more equal.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And ignorant - they fell for the conservative talking points too

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think there are a lot of progressives, but I think not enough of them live in swing states. I’m one, and I know there are some around in the college crowd. When Michigan went blue trifecta in 2022, I thought the pendulum was swinging, but now it looks like I was wrong.

      This guy might be an asshole, but I’m not certain that he’s wrong.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I blame my peers who didn’t vote just as much as my peers who voted for Trump for what is to come.

    I’m done giving a shit. We had a chance to stop this, and we sat on our ass.

    • john89
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I blame everyone who hasn’t learned from 2016 that expecting voters to “fall in line” is not a winning strategy.

      Unfortunately, you’re showing us that you still haven’t learned from your mistakes so I expect more conservative victories in the future.

      Anything to avoid helping out poor people at the expense of the rich, right?