- cross-posted to:
- canadapolitics
- cross-posted to:
- canadapolitics
Moscow’s disinformation is often shared unwittingly by Canadians who don’t know its origin or purpose. Canada needs to fight it with stronger actions.
Moscow’s disinformation is often shared unwittingly by Canadians who don’t know its origin or purpose. Canada needs to fight it with stronger actions.
It’s a movie that garners sympathy for the Russian soldiers. You hear Russian soldiers say various propaganda talking points.
Imagine it’s 1942 and a Canadian public funded movie was released showing how hard life was for average Nazis killing Slavs in Ukraine. In the 1942 movie it shows Nazis talking about how Ukrainians forced Germany to invade and the movie doesn’t provide a rebuttal.
Edit: redacted:
I haven’t seen the doc, but I feel like you’re conflating frontline soldiers and political leadership, and are very quick to use the term “propaganda”Showing that Russian soldiers are suffering too in Putin’s war does not sound like (encouraging) sympathizing with Putin to me or undermining Ukraine’s resistance. That take seems simplistic to the point of us collectively having to water down every political doc in existence.Edit: new: While I didn’t find your points compelling, the TVO documentary is the most/only cited and described example of supposed propaganda in the article. Based on these descriptions, I’d agree it’s propaganda. Not correcting falsehoods in a documentary meets criteria for me
Things like “it doesn’t provide a rebuttal” are often said, and I don’t find it convincing. There are ways to show the lies for what they are without directly arguing about it. Is the movie effective in doing that? It seems to depend on the viewer.