• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Where’s all the “Tik Tok is harmless!!!” people? They were everywhere 18 months ago when the US went after TikTok.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My main grip with wanting to ban tik tok was that it was a transparent attempt to keep a monopoly on propaganda. Tik tok is used by China in exactly the same way Twitter and Facebook are used.

      We need comprehensive laws against all forms of social media manipulation, since even the homegrown ones are being used to elect fascists.

      Tik tok is a scapegoat.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        We do have those laws in the EU. Parliament is inviting the TikTok CEO to question him about their adherence to those very laws. TikTok is legally required to actively work against manipulation especially around things like elections so they should have be on top of the botting that apparently went on. They’re supposed to follow these guidelines.

        …of course, parliament could have left it to the commission to enforce this stuff, i.e. fine TikTok, but as this is an election it’s absolutely legitimate to make a public scene. Drag that CEO before parliament and make him scramble for excuses before the presidential run-offs and parliament elections. Then post it to TikTok.

        TikTok isn’t a scapegoat, here, they’re being made an example of. Important difference.