Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can’t solve that.
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Thanks. I’ve mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
I can answer the question. No.
He’s right.
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
Christ, it’s like people just don’t even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
I get you are joking, but I’ve seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
This is bullshit, it defined but didn’t even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
But what if it was grown in Europe?
So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
I don’t know falls to his death
Naranja
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren’t people
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
“sup” without a "" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger’s TeX