After almost 3 years of work, I’ve finally managed to get this project stable enough to release an alpha version!

I’m proud to present Managarr - A TUI and CLI for managing your Servarr instances! At the moment, the alpha version only supports Radarr.

Not all features are implemented for the alpha version, like managing quality profiles or quality definitions, etc.

Here’s some screenshots of the TUI:

Additionally, you can use it as a CLI for Radarr; For example, to search for a new film:

managarr radarr search-new-movie --query "star wars"

Or you can add a new movie by its TMDB ID:

managarr radarr add movie --tmdb-id 1895 --root-folder-path /nfs/movies --quality-profile-id 1

All features available in the TUI are also available via the CLI.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’ll admit, as neat as this is, I’m a little unclear on the use case? Are there really situations where it’s easier to get a command prompt than it is to open a webpage?

    The CLI side I can see more use for since that does expose a lot of actions to bash scripting, which could be neat. But on the whole I can’t say I’ve ever really found myself thinking “Man, I really wish I had a UI for managing Radarr, a program that already includes a really good UI.”

    I know it’s shitty to hate on something just because you’re not the target for it. That’s not my intent, it’s more that I’m just fascinated by the question of how anyone has a burning need for this? It feels like there must be something I’m missing here.

    • choco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Could be really useful to have a UI over SSH without opening your web interface to the world. I will try because it seems great for my use case !

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        But that implies you do have your SSH open to the world, right?

        The way I access my private web interfaces remotely is through something like Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier. Same thing for SSH. No way in hell am I opening 22 on my router.

        • Revan343
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You can use any port for ssh. When I switched from 22 to 1337, brute force attempts at logging in stopped

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier

          No way in hell i am giving a company complete remote access to my servers and clients.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            You know those can be self hosted, right?

            And yes, by all means just set up your own Wireguard or OpenVPN access if that’s what you prefer. You do you bud.

          • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            All these companies do is make it easier to use wireguard, if you’re so afraid of them just use wireguard yourself, you’ll get the same effect

            • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              This is not really correct. Those companies take complete control of the secret keys. And no, it is not the same effect when you use tailscale compared to wireguard cause of various reasons. CGNAT, no port forwarding, funnels etc.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Cli doesn’t make much sense to me either when the *arr suite has a well documented rest API already.