GitHub - Dark-Alex-17/managarr: A TUI for managing *arr servers. Built with 🤎 in Rust
github.com
A TUI for managing *arr servers. Built with 🤎 in Rust - Dark-Alex-17/managarr

After almost 3 years of work, I’ve finally managed to get this project stable enough to release an alpha version!

I’m proud to present Managarr - A TUI and CLI for managing your Servarr instances! At the moment, the alpha version only supports Radarr.

Not all features are implemented for the alpha version, like managing quality profiles or quality definitions, etc.

Here’s some screenshots of the TUI:

Additionally, you can use it as a CLI for Radarr; For example, to search for a new film:

managarr radarr search-new-movie --query "star wars"

Or you can add a new movie by its TMDB ID:

managarr radarr add movie --tmdb-id 1895 --root-folder-path /nfs/movies --quality-profile-id 1

All features available in the TUI are also available via the CLI.

  • choco@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    102·
    21 days ago

    Could be really useful to have a UI over SSH without opening your web interface to the world. I will try because it seems great for my use case !

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      71·
      21 days ago

      But that implies you do have your SSH open to the world, right?

      The way I access my private web interfaces remotely is through something like Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier. Same thing for SSH. No way in hell am I opening 22 on my router.

      • choco@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        1·
        21 days ago

        You are not wrong, most of the time I SSH from the same IP so I only have 22 open from this adress. I think I just prefer managing this one access protected by a big key without thinking about my reverse proxy, plus I think TUI are neat. But objectively you are right, there may not be a lot of advantages.

        Thanks to the developers though, I always appreciate such hard work and sharing to the community ♥️

      • Revan343English
        22·
        21 days ago

        You can use any port for ssh. When I switched from 22 to 1337, brute force attempts at logging in stopped

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.mlEnglish
        16·
        21 days ago

        Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier

        No way in hell i am giving a company complete remote access to my servers and clients.

        • DesolateMood@lemm.eeEnglish
          71·
          21 days ago

          All these companies do is make it easier to use wireguard, if you’re so afraid of them just use wireguard yourself, you’ll get the same effect

          • ShortN0te@lemmy.mlEnglish
            13·
            21 days ago

            This is not really correct. Those companies take complete control of the secret keys. And no, it is not the same effect when you use tailscale compared to wireguard cause of various reasons. CGNAT, no port forwarding, funnels etc.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          41·
          21 days ago

          You know those can be self hosted, right?

          And yes, by all means just set up your own Wireguard or OpenVPN access if that’s what you prefer. You do you bud.