Not what i am saying. I said that it is not a given, that translation means less performance.

In theory you can achieve similar or even higher performance, all depending on how well or how bad the original machine code is. Especially when you can optimize it for a specific architecture or even a specific CPU.

And yes ARM has shown to be more power efficient then x86 CPUs even on higher load (not just low powered embedded stuff).

and any efficiency gains these fancy new ARM chips supposedly have will be lost when translating x86 to ARM.

Not a given. Translating can still be more efficient.

Yes, but when the list is long enough and you have enough words, it is to difficult to guess.

Think about it. The list of all possible characters is also known, still with enough length and randomness it becomes too difficult to guess too.

Everyone knows what the blue screen is. This makes the implication when the screen does appear really obvious.

No need to reinvent the wheel.

That is true. But then you could probably use the chunk length to determine where the ads starts and ends since there is with a very high probability an unusually long chunk at those times.

Sure there is, most messages are probably too short but in general yes. There is no difference to an online article.

I write a book that gets published. I still hold copyright over it even if it is in someone else’s bookshelf. What rights the copyright holder and the person has is regulated by law. For example a physical book can be resold or lent to someone else, but it is not allowed to copy it and sell the copies.

I can cite text from the boom, that falls under fair use but I cannot use whole chapters in a derived work.

I still hold copyright over my messages online, even when it is public or published, that is basic copyright law in most relevant legislations. If the training of an LLM and later selling access to the LLM with copyright infringed data is fair use is yet to be determined.

• Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user

Not quite sure why, they simply could in the fly stitch those files together.

Twitch is doing that for a while now i think.

And you need a team managing it. I doubt that they have not considered it.

No Gitlab is not AGPL, it is partly MIT and the corporate branch is under a proprietary license

You missed the point. It is not about if it is private or not, it is how they use it. You are allowed (on some pages) to read news article. Are you allowed to copy and publish them on your own site? No. You have a Copyright on your posts same as a author has on his books.

If it is legal or not is still to be discussed.

Similar to how data was mined (or even still is) about users without consent. Now there is for example the GDPR.

No, cat is not for writing files. Cat is for reading files and directing the data to standard output.

With “>” you are directing standard output to a file, in this case a blockdevice.

Why? I am free to use whatever I want. This is not Microsoft Windows.

Or just cat file.img > /dev/…

They would not be able to really. In theory every contributor (or at least the vast majority) would have to agree to that license change.

Yes. But it allows to define a custom storage layout based on user date time filename typ and album.

Now Android got the built-in “Night Light”. Still not a reason to downvote your suggestion.

But claiming that without it you damage your eyes is. Title heavily implies it.

Get redmoom @fdroid app #fdroid and save your 👁️👁️

There is actually very little evidence as of now, that blue light emitted by screens actually causes any significant long time damage.

Also most modern phones have this built in.

Absolutely yes. Even if it is not disguised executable.

It could contain an exploit which targets the video player you are opening it with.

No they can’t, that is basically illegal in every jurisdiction. Will not even click on that click bate title.