• radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t think Iran had to attack Israel in first place. Hezbollah sought this when they started attacking Israel after Oct 7th.

    • koper@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Ignoring all the assassinations and strikes by Israel, including the unprovoked bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus?

      • rappo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Are they really allies if they’re just an extension of yourself?

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Hamas and Hezbollah only exists because of the Ethnic Cleansing and Occupation of the native population of Palestine and Lebanon respectively.

          • rappo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t disagree, but what entities funds and guide/influence them? They aren’t organizations acting on their own, they are puppets.

            This does not in any way downplay the travesties that Palestinian people have been through, only to highlight how Iran has used their influence to control one side of the conflict.

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They certainly have shared interests, but to consider them ‘puppets’ ignores their own agencies. Armed resistance against Settler Colonialism will exist regardless of whether they can secure funding from Iran or not. Iran has influence as the main supplier of weapons (most of Hamas’ capabilities come from reusing bombs dropped by Israel that failed to detonate), but they do not control the agency of Hamas or Hezbollah. They have their own reasons to fight back.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      On the surface - perhaps. But Iran’s regime has to keep its image of power for its domestic peace. Israel’s gov knows this and they do steps they know would elicit response from Iran in the hopes Iran would actually hit hard and the US would be dragged in official capacity. That would be dramatically destabilizing for the region. I reckon the US threatened Israel with real steps in order to get them to not hit targets that would have led to such escalation.

        • acargitz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          By dismantling the apartheid, ending the occupation, getting the fuck on their side of their 1967 border, and recognizing the sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Plus, by handing over their war criminals to the ICC and starting a Truth and Reconciliation process. Throw in paying reparations, if they really want peace.

          There. Instantly, 90% of Hamas and Hezbollah support has just evaporated. Their neighbours are ready to normalize relations with them. The vast majority of world public opinion is now solidly behind them.

          • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’d be quite fine with most of this, all of it if by “the occupation” you mean the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. But, until peace is established there, that isn’t going to happen. The majority of Gazans support Hamas and believe they committed no atrocities on October 7th.

            • acargitz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              if by “the occupation” you mean the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank

              Yes, exactly. Including the control of their borders of course.

              until peace is established there, that isn’t going to happen

              That’s entirely the wrong framing. Without these things happening, whatever it is that you think will be established, it won’t be “peace”, is is only a return to the oppressive status quo ante. It’s a cliché but in this conflict, quite literally “no justice, no peace”. My laundry list above is not a desirable outcome after some imaginary unjust “peace”. It is the precondition for peace. Without dismantling the apartheid, the occupation, etc, you’ll only have a temporary lull in the brutality and they go again.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Stop making an enemy of all their neighbors with their apartheid/genocide project, would be a good start.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              10 hours ago

              They said leave all 1967 occupied areas.

              You responded with the entire population of Israel.

              • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                10 hours ago

                And I later asked how this will appease all these other actors that just want to wipe Israel off the map. How will that happen?

                  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    Does that make Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas any more likely to establish lasting peace with Israel if they surrender a tiny sliver of land?

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              They don’t have to go anywhere. They just don’t get a religious ethnostate any more. Let Palestine be a free democracy and they are welcome to live in a free society, no apartheid.

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              to be fair, it’s much easier if you just annex and slaughter the fucking browns who are there

              • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations, and Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Do you want to go to bat for them?

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Otzma Jehudit is part of the Israeli Government coalition, it consists mainly of internationally wanted terrorists. and you want to bat for these terrorists? the ones who have been preaching the 14 words as a justification for genocide?

                  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    12
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Assuming that’s true, that’s one group within the government. Find them, try them, and imprison them. On the other side are three entire genocidal terrorist regimes. Will you side with them? What do you think we should do with them?

                • bamboo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Calling the people you dislike “terrorists” to avoid critical thinking about the atrocities (including genocide) of your own side isn’t really the gotcha you think it is.

                  • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and Israel are currently acting as terrorist states/groups. That isn’t up for debate, because it’s objective reality.

                  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    12
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    I’m not calling them that on my own. I’m describing them the way multiple other nations have described them - not Israel. You only need to see their actions towards their own population to see why.

            • small44@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Read again I said the land colonized after 67 so the israelis aren’t moving anywhere

                • small44@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  All the post 67 land are considered occupied why Palestinians should give up their land?

                  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    I thought the entirety of Israel was unlawfully and immorally seized from the Palestinians over the course of decades. At least, that’s what most pro-Palestine folks seem to think.

                  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    I thought the entirety of Israel was unlawfully and immorally seized from the Palestinians over the course of decades. At least, that’s what most pro-Palestine folks seem to think.