Hello.

For a long time I have considered smart watches to be a gimmick but since they have become more accessible and common now for some time, I was wondering what the people who own and use them think of them?

So what has your experience been of them?

One thing I am curious about is how functional these (especially the Android ones) are without being connected to a phone via bluetooth since bluetooth drains battery?

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    1·
    4 years ago

    Still a gimmick IMO. My casio f-91w is going on 7 years now, it doesn’t scratch, I can shower with it, has a 10+ year battery life, and cost $10.

    • ksynwa@lemmy.mlOP
      2·
      4 years ago

      I might get something like this. I already have a Casio analogue+digital watch and while it looks cool, things like stopwatch and timer are needlessly hard to use. Would like something like this so I don’t have to take the phone to gym.

    • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
      2·
      4 years ago

      It also doesn’t have biometric sensors that siphon off information about your body and send it to some corporation. I’d say that’s a pretty big feature (or, lack of an anti-feature?).

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        3·
        4 years ago

        We’re very lucky some companies are still willing to still make non spying consumer electronics. Seems like TVs, thermostats, refrigerators, ovens, coffee makers, all have “smart” spying now.

        • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
          2·
          4 years ago

          I absolutely hate that there are no more consumer-level “dumb” TVs. (Edit: apparently there are, see the reply to this comment) Is not having a company know exactly what I’m watching even if it’s playing from an attached set top box or PC really too much to ask? (You probably know this already, but yes, they can do that. I’m think they don’t actually send off screenshots but rather diffuse pixel values from all over the screen? But still.)

          I mean there are dumb ones, but they’re commercial models and actually more expensive at the same resolution and refresh rate. Guess it’s because they’re designed for 24/7 operation but that’s honestly pointless for a home entertainment setup specifically.

          I’ve been trying to convince my family to take our living room TV off Wi-Fi and just get a cheap set top box for YouTube and Netflix for a while now. Yes it still tracks you, but at least I can have some peace of mind that what we do on the attached PC, which has a lot of our family’s personal files, isn’t being spied on by the freaking TV of all things.

          • someone@lemmy.ml
            11·
            4 years ago

            Oh dumb TVs still exist. See? All though I don’t know why you would want one, TV is a relic at this point. Today all you need is a PC and optionally a smartphone by which I mean PinePhone or Librem5 :)

            • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
              1·
              4 years ago

              The TV as a specific device is a relic, but a PC or smartphone is not suitable for family viewing. There are still some differences between tvs and monitors, but hopefully we can eventually just get rid of the two separate categories in favor of a single display category.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        1·
        3 years ago

        I’ve had to replace mine’s band. But its pretty incredible how cheap yet long-lasting these things are.

    • illgetanewone@lemmy.ml
      0·
      4 years ago

      Are we talking about the same watch? 😂

      I’m not very good at taking care of it, that’s true. I go through one every or every other year. Only my first one lasted 5 years until the battery ran out (and that only barely).

      A smartwatch wouldn’t last a week on my arm 😅

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        2·
        4 years ago

        How the eff did u do that! I’ve dropped a weight on mine before accidentally and it came out okay.

        Def gives you peace of mind when it’s so cheap tho, $10 is like 3 bags of chips.