It’s always weird trying to determine if things like this will be a flop or a serious societal issue.

  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    When Microsoft hears " how can Microsoft get any worse?" they have always taken that as a challenge.

  • stravanasu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    these autonomous agents represent the next step in the evolution of large language models (LLMs), seamlessly integrating into business processes to handle functions such as responding to customer inquiries, identifying sales leads, and managing inventory.

    I really want to see what happens. It seems to me these “agents” are still useless in handling tasks like customer inquiries. Hopefully customers will get tired and switch to companies that employ competent humans instead…

    • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      We got used to foreign call centers. They’re not incompetent, but the wording is always off, and I say this as someone whose English usage is not exclusively American. Took me weeks to drop the Aussie accent.

      • ericjmorey@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem with those call centers isn’t competency but authority and incentive to act autonomously to solve problems. Which is ironic because it looks like Microsoft is ready to sell ai with the authority to act autonomously.

        • Piers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s because they go hand in hand. I’ve had experience with customer service roles where staff are empowered to solve issues and it requires very very very slightly higher investment in your employees to pull off.