• ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      “Capitalist”. Yes.

      It’s not even capitalist any longer (if it ever really was). It’s reverted to a bizarrely-veneered version of feudalism.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          The sheer volume of government intervention to keep afloat rotting organizations that are “too big to fail” says that it’s not capitalist. It’s a bizarre form of welfare state for billionaires.

          • UtopianRevolt@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            To paraphrase one of my favorite quotes by the great Rev. King:

            “Socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for the rest”

      • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Can you think of a time when capitalism was not deeply feudalist? If you think the wave of laissez-faire over a century ago was any different, think again: the “miner towns” and other private cities where you boss is your landlord and mayor tells a different story. And don’t even get me started on colonial extractivism and how to massacre a culture/population then plant a corrupt overlord to extract another people’s resources.

        Capital was always supported by a strong centralized State, and even the libertarian utopians of Silicon Valley have always lived on Pentagon “welfare” money.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          In the small capitalism can be non-feudal.

          Scale it past, say, 300 people and it’s a nightmare of feudalism and billionaire welfare state.

          • poVoq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            What you mean is not Capitalism, but a market economy. Even in small groups Capitalism will necessarily result in a concentration of capital in a few hands and the resulting effects via social stratification.