• cron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because both ways are used. Microsoft relies on file names, linux on the first bytes of the file.

      • Consti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not quite correct. For html, that is to signal standard compliance, you can leave it away and the browser will still handle it. For the bash one, all (most) shell scripts use .sh, so you need to give a shebang to tell the loader which executable (sh, bash, zsh, csh, …) to use

        Also on Linux xdg does take file extensions into account, just executables do not

    • Revan343
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      For shell scripts it’s because bash isn’t the only shell; if you leave out the shebang line, Ubuntu will run your script in Dash instead

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      For HTML, it’s to distinguish “standards mode” HTML from “quirks mode” HTML (which doesn’t need a header).

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nothing unless you want to serve them without some other way to see what file type they are.

      You can run bash scripts with bash.

      Don’t know what a desktop file is.

      HTML has that because webservers used to not have auto media type detection and response headers.