• TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Xians are so friendly especially the part where they believe that I am going to suffer for eternity in a lake of fire.

    Feel the love.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As a Christian, I don’t believe the Bible because I agree with it and like it. I believe in it because I’m convinced it’s true. Kinda sounds like to me “pro vaccine are so hateful! Saying if I don’t take the vaccine I’ll get sick and die!”

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Genuine question. What convinces you that Bible is true? And among Abrahamic religions, why is this particular book true? Why do you accept “update” to Torah (that is, the Christian Bible), but not “update” to the Christian Bible (Quran)? Or do I miss the point?

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Glad you asked! I’ll start with the Torah. One of the central purposes of Judaism was and is waiting for the Messiah. It even makes its way into modern day Judaism. The likes of Isaiah 53 and Psalm 22 are clearly about Jesus of Nazareth. The records we have about Jesus consistently show to Him being perfect, doing miracles, being a good teacher, claiming to be the messiah and even God, and then He was crucified in the most humiliating way, died, and was buried. But on the third day He rose again from the dead and was seen by quite a few, who were so convinced they ended up entering a world of persecution and difficulty, many died. Because they refused to renounce that they had seen Him risen.

          As historical records go- the Bible is pretty comprehensive for records of its time. Most other people we know about have their records dating to hundreds of years after their existence. Jesus’ records were written within the lifetime of people who would have known Him. And they’re pretty consistent, unlike legends which rapidly evolve with time. The Bible has been pretty much the same. Give or take some less important passages, though.

          Now, there are a load of problems with Islam and the Qur’an, but I’ll keep it concise to how the Qur’an disproves itself. The Qur’an makes these points: The Gospel is the word of allah: 3:3-4 No one can change allah’s words: 18:27 Strongly implies that the Christians had the Gospel when the Qur’an was written: 7:157 Christians should judge by the Gospel: 5:47

          The Qur’an also denies the death of Jesus and His divinity, which the Bible claims. So it’s in obvious contradiction. So judging by the Gospel, Islam is false. And the Gospel cannot be corrupted as the Qur’an recommends the Gospel and claims allah’s words cannot be corrupted.

          Paul also gives us this warning: Galatians 1:8

          But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.

          Considering the Qur’an apparently was revealed to Mohammed by an “angel”… Yeah…

          The Islamic dilemma explained in a YouTube video

          I hope this makes sense

          • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Also possible that a good dude who preached love and kindness went into a coma when the tyrants put him on a cross, and then woke up a few days later, with no involvement whatsoever from the creator.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              So you’re suggesting a guy who was ruthlessly beaten and crucified , then stabbed in the side revealing that his lung had collapsed, simply recovered after two nights in a tomb and pushed a boulder out of the way, without the armed guards noticing? And who were the dudes just chilling there? And how do you explain the ascension into heaven?

              It is possible, but I’m not buying it

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “2000 year old goat herder fairytales are more real to me than consistently tested and verified modern scientific findings”

                  • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    religion was/is just a way to explain the unexplainable for lack of science.
                    and since we have gotten so much better in recent modern times of explaining things, religion is just some antiquated relic people hold onto from ancient times, further pushed by the fact that someone wrote it down a long time ago.

                    the difference is that in science there is peer review, such as the scientific method and the ability to reproduce, verify/review and publish results.
                    whereas in religion it’s a lot of opinions on things that may or may not have happened.

                    but hey, if it makes you a better person and love thy neighbor and sticketh to they 10 commandments and all that, then more power to you. to each their own.
                    but not when you start pushing your beliefs onto others or blowing shit up or waging all out war.

                    (imo)