flamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agoMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1322arrow-down116
arrow-up1306arrow-down1imageMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoNope, it means “for any” as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoI sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.
Nope, it means “for any” as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification
I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
I sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.