DickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoStinglemm.eeimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1251arrow-down110
arrow-up1241arrow-down1imageStinglemm.eeDickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoMatt Keeslar. He played Feyd in the 2000 miniseries.
minus-squareboogetyboo@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoI’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoIt was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise. However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget. But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
Who is the first one?
Matt Keeslar. He played Feyd in the 2000 miniseries.
I’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
It was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
It’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
It’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise.
However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget.
But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.