• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    CDPR? admittedly they’re really good at gaining it back again, kinda homer simpsons vibes where they repeatedly fuck up but then make an honest attempt to make things right only to repeat the cycle all over again.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      CDPR mistakes can be corrected, but blizzard games are designed from the ground up, with purpose, to be fuckup games in order to milk as much money as possible from it players. There is no correcting the boat for blizzard because for the managers of blizzard the boat IS correct

      • MindTraveller
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah, I’m never going to forgive CDPR for milking the “mix it up” scandal for publicity. They gave a cosplay award to a cis woman who stuck a glowstick down her pants pretending to be trans. I have no ill will towards the artist who designed the poster; she was criticising companies that commodify trans bodies for profit. What she didn’t know, is that she was working for one of those companies.

    • Raab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hopefully their transition to unreal engine 5 gets away with a lot of their launch issues I genuinely love all of their games but their release dates being “game launch +1-2 years” hurts me.

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      CDPR is still on my “probably pass” list after cyber punk. I read the launch news, stayed faraway. I picked it up this year, after all the patches and work and… yeah it’s still fundamentally broken.

      Not in terms of balance or bugs, but it didn’t have the magic. To start, I really don’t like fantasy games. They’re just not my thing. Witcher 3 had bad combat mechanics, could be terribly grindy and YET is one of my top five games. The story telling, from the plot itself the tiny immersive details in the world, hooked you. They nailed the big things, but it was the little things like sometimes you’d free someone, and realize they murdered a bunch of dudes who were minding their own business, and none of this was mentioned in or affected any other plot line, it was just a random detail in the universe.

      Cyberpunk has a semblance of the big stuff, but exactly none of the soul. I cared about some of the main characters (emphasis on “some”) but exactly none about the world. It never felt like more than a backdrop.

      A loss and misstep is ok, particularly given a growing studio, the problem with CDPR is they think they fixed cyberpunk. With that mentality I’m giving their next game a huge berth.

      And if you liked cyberpunk, enjoy. There are parts to be enjoyed. There are some neat plot threads, some nifty side quests, if you enjoy it don’t let people ruin it for you.

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They lied about Cyberpunk. They knew it was bad on release and maliciously made decisions so that people would still buy it. That’s not some minor thing, that’s a crime. “We leave greed to others”, yeah, right. And this problem was never addressed by CDPR, like it’s a normal thing to do, they think it’s okay.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Man, Cyberpunk was not a Homer-like fuckup. They were promising features which were nowhere near ready, while their whole game hardly ran at all. That’s a crime, at least in my country. Homer doesn’t do crimes…