Or alternatively https://odysee.com/@davidbombal:0/why-grapheneos-is-almost-impossible-to:4

This sounded like it would be for CPUs and other chips in PCs but from the sound of it, it’ll be for low power chips that dont heat up much.

Are they sitting on Trump’s flaccid dick and hoping it gets hard with this agreement? What the fuck is wrong with them? Some countries can even coordinate their own states to provide access to each other, but they are happy with an entire surveillance state accessing that data? Where is the national pride? Where is the sovereignty?

If China asked for this level of access, the EU would tell them to suck it, export limits be damned! But the land of the fat and unjust asks and their only comment is “that’s too fast”? The EU and its citizens are such pushovers. Incredible.

That makes sense. Congrats on getting it up and running. I need to finish at least one project I started! Much respect for doing so.

Why not GrayJay?

Corporate loves it! Free, unpaid work means no opensource spirit can stop them in court. Pushover license is a perfect name for it.

Yes, but Microsoft and other US companies can do whatever they like. The NSA has never hacked into European telecommunication networks or spied on politicians. I guess, as long as the boogeyman is non-white, all is good.

It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if those companies (birdychat and haiklet) were developed by Facebook themselves. Going to their websites literally only talks about WhatsApp interop as if they were demo projects.

https://trufflesecurity.com/blog/anyone-can-access-deleted-and-private-repo-data-github

Arguing as if kernel level anticheat should even exist on linux. (It shouldn’t). If your anticheat fails because the user has too much freedom, it probably isn’t a good anticheat.

Of course not, a shortage means higher prices

Every year? What in the world are you doing with your hardware and software?

We are truly a vassal state.

On the phoronix forums there are people seething about Rust nonstop. Rust in the linux kernel is their favorite enemy and they will have very strong opinions about it without ever having written rust nor a line of code in the kernel.

Rust won’t 100% replace C++ code in old code bases but I’m convinced that in 5-10 years the amount of new C++ code will fall behind Rust code.

With that logic there’s no need to even encrypt your partitions 🤷

Sure, but unencrypted means it can be tampered with. The bootloader can be modified to write your password to disk and once you boot, submit that to a server somewhere - or worse.

Why not have the BIOS decrypt the disk then continue the boot process as normal?

They’ll somehow get Google to pay them to make it the default search engine for the alliance.

Is this Nazi hardware now? Or are we still waiting for Framework to endorse and hire more Nazis?

Yeah, the second he started talking about computer architecture, I thought “he’s going to align the data and keep it close to each in memory for better caching and faster access, isn’t he?”.

At the moment, it looks like an interesting way to optimise an existing program. I’m not sure if thinking about it right from the beginning will speed up programming as, IMO, first something functional has to be written with somewhat good architecture, then the architecture improved to make sense and more features added, and once a v1 exists that’s satisfactory, then optimisation starts.

Maybe I’m wrong though and this is something that can be considered from the getgo, but it feels more like a latestage kind of thing. Some if it can definitely be taken care of by the compiler and the developer made aware of with warnings.