• michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    No society can raise 1 year olds sufficiently to participate in the political process. Clearly all citizens can’t participate so we in fact DO need to set an age limit. 18 seems pretty reasonable. Do you have a different suggestion?

    • MindTraveller
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      1 year olds should vote if they want to. Most don’t want to, but it’s still important that they have the right.

      It’s like in Life Of Brian. Loretta has the right to have babies even though her body can’t do it.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        1 year olds can’t want to because they are only capable of saying mama or hungry. I’m trying to get you to understand their is a minimum amount of understanding one needs to actually participate.

        • MindTraveller
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Okay, suppose I buy your argument that we should restrict people’s rights to do things that they already physically cannot do. It seems pointless and absurd, but let’s say I buy your premise.

          Set the voting age to 3, then.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            3 year olds can use 2-3 word sentences, don’t understand people die (on average) or really most anything other than that they like candy and hate bed time. This is again just giving their parents extra votes. Would you like to argue directly for that position?