- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Saved you a click: “Even though the two investigations were conducted four years apart, a finding common to both was that the most loyal supporters of Donald Trump were likely to score high on the trait of conscientiousness.”
The entire article is still worth a read, though.
Maybe I just don’t know what “conscientious” means.
Conscientiousness, one of the Big Five personality traits, is defined as a tendency to control one’s impulses, be persistent, act dutifully, and live up to one’s obligations to others.
Conscientiousness has been linked to a variety of positive traits and behaviors, such as responsibility, dependability, hard work, goal orientation, self-control, and leadership. Some conscientious people, however, happen to be dogmatic, inflexible, unquestioningly obedient, and intolerant of uncertainty (i.e., they tend to see things in black-and-white)
I had the same thought.
likely to score high on the trait of conscientiousness
😂🤣🤣😂
Had to read it after your comment.
Syphilis?
Room temperature IQs?
yes! finally, a positive future human consequence attributable to global warming!
Gullibility.
Counterpoint: racism.
“Christianity”
From the article:
Conscientiousness, one of the Big Five personality traits, is defined as a tendency to control one’s impulses, be persistent, act dutifully, and live up to one’s obligations to others.
Conscientiousness has been linked to a variety of positive traits and behaviors, such as responsibility, dependability, hard work, goal orientation, self-control, and leadership. Some conscientious people, however, happen to be dogmatic, inflexible, unquestioningly obedient, and intolerant of uncertainty (i.e., they tend to see things in black-and-white).
Seems somewhat damning of the Big 5 Model that one of the traits being high can mean two wildly different personalities. Perhaps they need a 6th factor, or perhaps personality inventories based on binary pairs of traits are about as accurate and useful as horoscopes?
I bet I score high in this but I am sure as heck not a trump supporter. I know stupid when I see it and live under if for four years.
You mean other than all being super weird creeps and/or squares?
Psychology Today Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Psychology Today is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Bias: Pro-Science
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/psychology-today/Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.Footer
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
