• AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yeah, in this particular situation, this might be the lesser of two evils. But, the true solution would have been them actually knowing what they’re doing and having sufficient reserve capacity, like a utility is supposed to have for this exact reason.

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      exactly, they spent time and money doing this instead of investing in infrastructure 🤦‍♂️

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It sounds like this is fairly cheap to implement. I imagine the utility just pays for software from a vendor that integrates in with the consumers’ existing smart thermostats. From there, it’s just the cost of the incentive payments.