A California-based startup called Savor has figured out a unique way to make a butter alternative that doesn’t involve livestock, plants, or even displacing land. Their butter is produced from synthetic fat made using carbon dioxide and hydrogen, and the best part is —- it tastes just like regular butter.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s also closer to butter than butter alternatives. It’s not made to be more healthy, just more planet friendly.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      81
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fake food is going to be more healthy than the real deal?

      Sure buddy

      • Cagi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        This fallacy is called an appeal to nature.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          47
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is also a fact that butter is a staple food that has been used for thousands of years with a proven track record.

          • Cagi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            57
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            This fallacy is called an appeal to tradition.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              41
              ·
              5 months ago

              Just because something is fallacy the way it was presented does not make it wrong if he facts check out :)

              • Cagi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                44
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Your facts don’t check out, that’s what makes you wrong. Fallacies are just the symptom.

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  33
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Is butter not the best product in its class? both from health ie nutrition value and taste perspective?

                  • Cagi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    26
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Not anymore. This product matches butter on both counts and puts out much less pollution and takes up much less land than factory farming. I urge you to actually read the article, many of your points are addressed within.

          • ragica@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            This may be a logical fallacy known as false equivalence, when one fact is stated or implied to be conflated with another not directly related fact.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            So is any meat, mayonnaise, even butter is processed. Ever went into a fast food chain? Most ingredients are processed to the bits.

            You better not take any medicine, that super processed? And Coca cola or any energy drinks? Bleh, made in labs!

            I guess you only eat whole grains collected by you, that must suck.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I wrote it’s not made to be more healthy, because that’s the current marketing of butter alternatives. This isn’t claiming to be more healthy. The compounds are the same as the fatty acids in butter.

        It’s simply a way to get butter while reducing carbon dioxide, rather than increasing it.

      • Deebster@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        If it’s chemically identical, what does it matter if it’s come from dairy, this process, or a Star Trek replicator?

      • uhmbah
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Good or bad, it’s still processed food.

        That’s my half-assed neutral statement. I choose not to eat processed foods. As long as there’s disclosure, I don’t care.

        What people eat or don’t eat is their business.