• sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    This says a lot about spells in 5e.

    Yes, there are many great choices, but one choice is usually greater than others.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Come to Pathfinder, where all the spells are kind of okay I guess.
      please don’t kill me

      • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Pathfinder 2 is even worse in that regard. You have a few kind of okay ones and then a bunch you’ll essentially never use. The price of Pf2s strife for “balance”.

        • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s probably my biggest pain point with the system. I have a buddy who only likes to play magicians. She’s miserable playing 2e because the cool evocative spells she gravitates towards just aren’t the narrow list of reliable, evergreen, and efficient spells that thrive in 2e’s ecosystem.

      • caseyweederman
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hey now, you only need to pick twelve interdependent feats in order to make Counterspell useful!

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think my next stop on the TTRPG tour will be Blades In The Dark. I borrowed the flashback mechanic for a 5e heist and it was pretty great.