• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals. It does contain details of Hunter making corrupt deals that Hunter claims Joe was party to. Joe’s knowledge of those deals would need to be corroborated by some other source. It’s not just dick and drug pics on the laptop.

    • remotelove
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Had a look at that laptop yourself, did ya’? Did you win pillow guy’s hackathon challenge or something?

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t need to see the laptop my self it has been authenticated and contents given to the NY Post who published them. Hunter himself confirmed the emails to be authentic under oath.

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Hahahaha that article doesn’t have proof of shit.

          It has excerpts of text we are told came from an email from hunter, and they’re supposing the language used is code for Joe.

          You’ve gotta have something more substantial than this, surely?

          I love that the conservative position has evolved from “but her emails” to “but his emails” and you’re still no closer to proving anything but you’re still so sure.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Your reading comprehension is terrible, I’m guessing 5th or 6th grade level. I never made the claim the emails on Hunter’s laptop proved Joe was party to the corrupt deals. Litterly the 1st sentence of my original post acknowledges so.

            Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals.

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Maybe you and your reading comprehension. That comment was a response to your last comment, which contained an article link which did make that argument.

              Next time you try to provide a source make sure you understand what it says, and call out the relevant parts lol.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Expecting you to understand that big long article was my fault I’ll move a little slower so you don’t get confused.

                What exactly in my original statement are you disputing? When you provide this I will copy the text that supports my statement for you so you don’t have to read that big scary article.

                • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Oh I’ve provided that already. Your original comment doesn’t work until you can provide proof that “evidence” came off of Hunter’s laptop.

                  Even if it has, I don’t really care because Hunter isn’t running for election, his father is.

                  If you’re trying to implicate Joe you need to provide evidence of that, which you’ve failed to do.

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Your original comment doesn’t work until you can provide proof that “evidence” came off of Hunter’s laptop.

                    Is Hunter Biden authenticating the email evidence enough? Here’s a part of the transcript of his testimony.

                    Exhibit 16 is a subject,8 Expectations. It’s from James Gilliar to Tony Bobulinski. Rob Walker and yourself.9 Have you seen this email before?10 A I have. I’ve seen it, I think, as we all have, 8,642,300 times.11 Q Okay. And you’d expected we’d ask you about it here today, correct?12 A Of course, I did, yeah.13 Q Okay.14 A Yeah.15 Q At the bottom, so I’ll skip reading the whole email if I may. And at the16 bottom, it says, "At the moment, there’s provisional agreement that the equity will be17 distributed as follows.18 A Uh-huh.19 Q “20 to H,” which presumably is yourself. Is that correct?20 A Yes.21 Q “20, RW,” that’s Rob Walker, correct?22 A Yes.23 Q “20, James Gilliar.” Is that correct?24 A Yes.

                    If you’re trying to implicate Joe you need to provide evidence of that, which you’ve failed to do.

                    Your 5th grade reading comprehension strikes again at no point have I claimed the emails on Hunters laptop implicate Joe.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly. It’s funny to watch the left dance around the laptop. Harhar I won’t vote for hunter

      It has some seriously Incriminating information on there.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The dipshits in congress have been trying for almost a year and a half to find anything to pin on Biden and have failed spectacularly. The laptop might have incriminating stuff about Hunter, but Joe Biden is famously a different person, and is clean.

        But hey, if you want to be outraged at the blatant corruption displayed by Trumps daughter and son in law as they held official positions in the federal government, something that Hunter never has, then we can at least pretend to care about the idiotic laptop. Oh yeah and also the convicted felon and rapist Donald Trump himself.

        But you won’t. So it’s fine.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          The laptop might have incriminating stuff about Hunter, but Joe Biden is famously a different person, and is clean. Molesting your daughter isn’t “clean”. Taking bribes isn’t “clean”.

          • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Who molested whose daughter?

            Who took bribes?

            Cite.

            I remember 45 calling his daughter a piece of ass. And you’re still going to vote for him.