• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh I’ve provided that already. Your original comment doesn’t work until you can provide proof that “evidence” came off of Hunter’s laptop.

    Even if it has, I don’t really care because Hunter isn’t running for election, his father is.

    If you’re trying to implicate Joe you need to provide evidence of that, which you’ve failed to do.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Your original comment doesn’t work until you can provide proof that “evidence” came off of Hunter’s laptop.

      Is Hunter Biden authenticating the email evidence enough? Here’s a part of the transcript of his testimony.

      Exhibit 16 is a subject,8 Expectations. It’s from James Gilliar to Tony Bobulinski. Rob Walker and yourself.9 Have you seen this email before?10 A I have. I’ve seen it, I think, as we all have, 8,642,300 times.11 Q Okay. And you’d expected we’d ask you about it here today, correct?12 A Of course, I did, yeah.13 Q Okay.14 A Yeah.15 Q At the bottom, so I’ll skip reading the whole email if I may. And at the16 bottom, it says, "At the moment, there’s provisional agreement that the equity will be17 distributed as follows.18 A Uh-huh.19 Q “20 to H,” which presumably is yourself. Is that correct?20 A Yes.21 Q “20, RW,” that’s Rob Walker, correct?22 A Yes.23 Q “20, James Gilliar.” Is that correct?24 A Yes.

      If you’re trying to implicate Joe you need to provide evidence of that, which you’ve failed to do.

      Your 5th grade reading comprehension strikes again at no point have I claimed the emails on Hunters laptop implicate Joe.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Speaking of reading comprehension, there’s no mention of Joe in that transcript, so why should I care?

        For someone who likes to put other’s down for their ability to comprehend information you’ve yet to make this connection definitively.

        I don’t care what Joe’s kids do any more than I care what Trump’s kids do. As long as they’re not involved in whatever it is, why should anyone give a shit? You still haven’t answered this part.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Once again your 5th grade reading skills let you down. In my original reply, I disputing that Hunters laptop only contained dick & drug picks.

          My initial reply

          It’s not just dick and drug pics on the laptop.

          I don’t care what Joe’s kids do any more than I care what Trump’s kids do. As long as they’re not involved in whatever it is, why should anyone give a shit? You still haven’t answered this part.

          You clearly do care just based on your replies.

          • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Petty insults don’t make arguments for you. You still haven’t elaborated on what ties any of this to Joe or why anyone should care.

            What are you trying to do here apart from rage on Hunter? Why are you even caring enough to comment here at all?

            You seem to have BDS (Biden Derangement Syndrome). Might want to get that looked at.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Petty insults don’t make arguments for you. You still haven’t elaborated on what ties any of this to Joe or why anyone should care.

              I explicitly said none of the emails implicated Joe. The logical explanation for your lack of understanding is you’re slow and can’t comprehend simple sentences.

              What are you trying to do here apart from rage on Hunter? Why are you even caring enough to comment here at all?

              If you could read and understand my original comment you would know I was disputing the claim that his emails were just drug and dick picks.

              • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Good god you’re dense, I’m not challenging what you’re saying, but why. What’s the point of even bringing up Hunter? He’s irrelevant, politically speaking.

                • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Keep disputing a point get proven wrong then jump to some irrelivent point.

                  What’s the point of even bringing up Hunter?

                  This whole conversation has your jimmies rustled so it must have some relevance to you.

                  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    I’m asking a simple question. With as much shit as you’ve been talking you should be able to answer it.

                    Tone is hard to convey over text, if you sense rustled jimmies they’re not from me asking a question. Your refusal to answer it directly however, might be an indicator of where the rustled jimmies lie.

                    Do you always get so defensive when asked a question?