Could easily make it 20 1st and 2nd are in with bye all 3rd and top 2 4th play each other. The down side group play will be meaningless.

The verse is not about using your neighbors wealth to help someone, it’s about using your own wealth to do so. The verse did not go.

I was a stranger and you did not invite me in to your neighbors house, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me with your neighbors clothing, I was sick and in prison and you did not have your neighbor look after me.’

“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

“He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not have your neighbor do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

I’m not debating whether taking down the statue was right or not. My point of contention is that when Trump said very fine people there is no indication he was calling nazis and white supremists very fine people.

It looks like your little example blew up in your face.

I don’t consider everyone that attended BLM protests rioters, do you?

So some of the people there protesting the teardown were fine people?

I’m glad to see you’re afraid to debate me.

They were there, he referred to people there as very fine people

Were there other people there besides white supremists and meo-nazis opposing the tear down of the statue?

No one is disputing Trump said “very fine people on both sides”, which is what your link confirms. The false narrative was that he was talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists which he doesn’t mention at all. Your clip doesn’t prove Trump was talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists, unless you can show that everyone who was there protesting the removal was a neo-Nazis or white supremacists.

Mexican Agriculture Minister Victor Villalobos also participated in the meeting. He suggested that in future Mexican inspectors could take the place of the U.S. personnel who currently handle the checks.

I wonder how much of a kickback Victor gets for looking the other way.

Attract more skilled workers by making the conditions worse. This has to make the top 10 worse economic government decisions list.

How you treat them doesn’t change that they’ve lost rights expressly enumerated in the constitution.

Criminals do not keep all their constitutional rights, when they are incarcerated they are not free to move about or posses many things. Felons on probation are not allowed to associate with other felons.

The most famous tank hobbyists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqV-LyhduSM

The flip side of that coin is if there are not enough opportunities for the current population adding more people is not a good idea.

You don’t even have to go as far as calling it a Russian hoax. In April of this year, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee investigating Hunter’s laptop found no wrongdoing. Do you believe the Republican House Committee specially tasked with finding in timing evidence in his emails are also part of the hoax?

No, the Russian hoax was a false claim that the laptop and the emails were fake. No evidence of wrong doing by Joe does not change the authenticity of the laptop.

Would you rather I double-down on the wrong thing? No wait that’s what Republicans do.

You just keep changing the reason you objected to my reply, first it was asking for a source, then the source “didn’t prove shit”, then Hunter confirming emails shut you up about that, then you bounced to its not relivent, now you seem to be arguing that there is no evidence of wrong doing by Joe, which is strange as I’ve been saying that through this thread.

You’re making up an accusation I made about you.

Also you

It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry.

There’s no reason to lie.

I’m simply looking for you to directly address that this is not related to Joe and that Hunter is irrelevant. Why won’t you just state it?

Emails showing Hunter and his buddies trying to set up corrupt deals with Joe isn’t relivent? That’s certainly worth looking into.

In other words, would it be more/less/same relevance for me to post an article about some shit one of TFG’s kids may or may not have done?

Who is TFG? If TFG is an elected official and there is evidence of TFGs kids scheming to involve TFG then yes.

I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.

I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.

Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

*No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.

So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.

Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry. Otherwise you already would’ve. You’re just deep into the sunk cost fallacy rn and flailing.

Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.

I haven’t once dismissed away anything you’ve provided evidence for

Also you

Hahahaha that article doesn’t have proof of shit.

There’s no reason to lie about things.

I’m simply asking you why you give enough of a shit to follow Hunter at all and discuss him on a Political community

There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop. Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings. I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.

I don’t give a single fuck what Hunter Biden does or doesn’t do, because he is not relevant in society.

Then why ask for sources showing his wrong doing and dispute those sources?

I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.

You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.

More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care, I’ll answer yours. I dont have some nonsense gotcha that I’m clutching to.

Replace care with relevant.

Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.

Better?

Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.

So why do you care enough to comment here at all?

As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.

When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.

• You claimed I stated there were good white supremists. Below is your lie.

You claim there are good white supremacists.

• You’ve claimed I was gaslightning you and then in your very next reply claimed you never stated I was making things up. One of those is a lie.

Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant

I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.

If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.