• marmulak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    What would you say are the benefits of this? Surely Russians fleeing Russia are not the ones responsible for the war on Ukraine

    • Ninmi@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As stated in the article, people leaving for humanitarian reasons are exempt from this.

      More than any clear benefits, it’s bizarre that Russia has attacked Europe in essence, yet its citizen are travelling across Europe like nothing is happening. Finland is one of these hubs for such travel and it needs to stop until Russia stops its agression.

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      it seems they have designed carve-outs for this purpose, although ymmv

      Exceptions to the rule include:

      • Russian embassy employees and their family members working in Estonia;
      • Employees directly involved in the transportation of goods and passengers;
      • Those who have the right to freedom of movement under EU law;
      • People visiting close relatives;
      • People entering for humanitarian reasons.

      personally i don’t see why you need to pass a law like this but, i suppose i’m not estonian

      • marmulak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Also I am not Estonian.

        Personally I can imagine different cases. There are Russians fleeing who strongly oppose Putin and his war. Even just normal people who would like to get away from sanctions, or can’t toerlate life in a country like Russia in general. I don’t have an issue with such people, but then there are possibly also wealthy/corrupt Russians who are good with Putin but just want to enjoy themselves in Europe while normal Russians suffer under sanctions. I would not want to let those people travel.