So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose “any authenticator” and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it’s demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

  • Martin@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not concerned per se and I definitely applaud the MFA requirement. I mean I hate MS and don’t like apps I don’t need, and I don’t trust them, but as others pointed out this would mostly just be whiny. That’s why I asked for reasons why restricting users to MS Authenticator would be preferable. If it’s more secure or technically way easier and thus cheaper to maintain then fine, I’ll find an acceptable way to comply. If not, then it’s them who are whiny and I’d rather make the case to let us use whatever authenticator we already have installed.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      But MS Authenticator isn’t a normal 6-digit Authenticator; it scans your Face ID (or finger print) and in many cases (like my work) it can be support password less accounts (relying only on something you have and something you are).

      And in regard to your point that you don’t want to install apps you don’t need, it sounds like you do in fact need this app.

      🤷‍♀️

    • rekabis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      reasons why restricting users to MS Authenticator would be preferable

      As a security professional:

      1. Under most situations, it is equally as good as any other 2FA app.
      2. Within the Microsoft ecosystem, it provides additional security features above and beyond simple 2FA.

      If your workplace is leaning heavily on the Microsoft ecosystem, especially their cloud offerings like Azure, then restricting employees to the Microsoft app is a no-brainer, and actually quite reasonable.

      For example, if they happen to have a hybrid domain with an on-prem domain controller syncing with Azure (forgive me for using obsolete terms, I’m a greybeard), then they can control all access to all company assets, including 2FA. If an employee leaves the company, they can also disable the Microsoft app at a moment’s notice by disabling the employee’s Microsoft account. Because everything is hooked into Azure, it sends push notifications down to all company assets - like the Microsoft 2FA app - to unhook all of the company’s credentials and prevent employee access after the fact.

      You cannot do this with other 2FA apps.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is disingenuous though… You can simply reset the TOTP seed on any account to achieve the same operation. We use AuthLite on a local domain… I can disable an account domain-wide by simply resetting the TOTP seed or disabling the account. Using an Azure domain and MS app doesn’t add any value in that regards. All of the online office stuff can be linked onto a local domain as well and would also be disabled.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          You don’t even need to disable an ex-employee’s ability to generate TOTP codes… Once the account is disabled what use are the codes?

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Well that’s a bit of the point of my post… why are you making it out like disabling the 2fa app matters?

            Edit: Swype typos!

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’m guessing they never mentioned that it tracks your location? That’s why they insist on using it not any of the other bullshit.