• eran_morad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can thank the traitor john roberts for turning the NRA into a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s the NRA. They’re trash. All my homies hate the NRA. They’re a gun manufacturer lobbying group, not a gun rights group.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh I’m aware. However, the members I’ve talk to insist otherwise.

        That said, I don’t know of any gun rights groups that came to advocate for either man- although I admit I don’t follow the subject of gun rights groups closely.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The only members I know that support them can also explain 4H to me. They’re heavy into the training side and own cows.

          I don’t think any have. I’m not sure any bother going against cops - regardless of the situation. They have nothing to gain by going after pigs.

          Same with Biden. Some (hopefully) might support eliminating those idiotic laws, but they can only lose on that. It’d be actively harmful considering the pure ignorance that flows out of his father’s mouth when he talks about firearms.

          We need a prominent pro-self defense rights group that’s anti-cop and not specifically conservative. Granted, starting one sounds like a good way to starve.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I would say that if the NRA could make a big stink about Kyle Rittenhouse, they certainly could have made a big stink about Philando Castile. A legal gun owner getting killed for doing what he was supposed to do, what the NRA advises doing, in that situation should be exactly who the NRA should be making a big stink about if they were sincere, which they are not.

            • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I agree they’re not, but Rittenhouse wasn’t in a shootout with cops. There have been some situations where white people either got killed by cops in fucky situations or killed cops in fucky situations. I highly doubt any of the gun rights groups touch those.

              I can’t remember their names (I know) but one was an older defense contractor. A crackhead stole his truck, got popped, then claimed the drugs in the truck were the truck owner’s. Pigs being pigs, they raid the old man and shoot him dead.

              Another one was a guy who was ratted on by a CI. Another raid happens and a cop kicks out his lower door panel and gets killed by the home owner.

              These are both 10 or 15+ years ago. I’ll try hunting them down. I’m sure Reason has them archived.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      You mean the ATF? The atf is the government department dedicated to guns. The NRA is a pro-guns lobby group.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, I mean the NRA. Why aren’t they leaping to his defense? Much like how they didn’t leap to the defense of a black legal gun owner who was murdered by police.

        • Kaboom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          They generally dont do that. Theres a highly publicized exception every once in a while, but it is not the norm.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Weird, you’d think those two national news cases would be exactly the time for an organization that claims to be a gun rights organization would make a highly publicized exception for.

            Kyle Rittenhouse? They were behind him all the way.

            It sure sounds more like they don’t care about gun owners when they don’t look a certain way or have a certain political bent.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There’s so much useless noise coming from that channel that I can’t rely on anything I think I know about Hunter Biden. All I’m willing to say is that I’m pretty sure he’s a real person. Oh, and he may have owned a laptop at some point. That’s it.

    They’re talking about a trial, but has he been officially indicted with anything?

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ehhhhhh…. not so much.

        These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

        • breakingcups@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 month ago

          Left out the next paragraph:

          Overall, we rate Raw Story Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that usually favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and promptly correcting any false or misleading reports.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re biased. That’s the point I was making. News should not be biased. Period.

            End of story.

            • nova_ad_vitum
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You ended a comment with “period” and “end of story” so you must be right.