What’s that / mean?

Now that I think about it, Harvard has what the biggest endowment in history by far? It’s peanuts for them to preserve it.

Do peoples still want a tan?

Helllloooo rats in warehouses.

Now hire someone to do the interviews, then it’s passive income.

Funny enough lots of people hate that. Lots of people have binary thinking, it’s either 100% coal or 100% solar.

Hunker down while growing the world’s population!

Wang’s reported comments suggest that Russia’s war in Ukraine may serve China’s strategic needs as focus is deviated away from Beijing’s mounting preparation to launch its own eventual invasion into Taiwan.

They want 3000 a day. That equals 4.4 million over 4 years. Shocker they won’t limit it to criminals.

Yup, anyone saying it’s fake is missing that there are many people that think this way.

Well, is this a situation where many chocolate companies conglomerated to a specific area?

Yet all of that priceless data may soon be discarded due to President Donald Trump’s ongoing feud with Harvard

Willett and his team were left scrambling to find the funds needed to protect freezers stocked with stool, urine and DNA specimens gathered from thousand of nurses for nearly five decades. Just the liquid nitrogen needed to keep the specimens frozen costs thousands of dollars a month.

Nope! I will continue to inform protest-non-voters what they voted for. Ciao.

When it comes to maga, they just kiss ass even more.

Hmm sugar on the handle.

Masihi, who is now in her 40s, was 3 when she came to the United States as a refugee from Iran. About 15 years ago, her green card was revoked due to a prior conviction she had for theft, and since then she’s been dedicated to regaining her legal status, Sahakyan told the Los Angeles TV station in an interview.

“I’m very for [the United States vetting] Iranian nationals because of the sleeper cells,” Sahakyan told Fox 11. “I think it will resolve a lot of issues because we’ll know exactly who’s in here for what reasons, even though I miss [my wife] dearly.”

Nope! I will continue informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

That whole article was wild. Worth the read.

I am in fact informing. Ciao.

The strawman were 1) that I was blaming 2) that I was mad. I think you know this. I’ll say it once more: I am informing protest non voters what they voted for. I’m out.