Because when provided with positive evidence of obvious bias, you demanded proof of a negative which is ranges from prohibitively difficult to impossible. This is not a valid form of reasoning. The inability to disprove something is not a valid reason to believe in it.
Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue.
She looks like someone with a standing weekly Botox appointment on her calendar.
That would be good but that’s not going to solve this. There is rot at the core of American culture and Trump is the inevitable culmination of it. There’s no single rule that can be changed to fix this.
Then you agree that they’re not in fact close to realizing literally anything?
They are absolutely not and will not under any circumstances actually go after Trump for any of this.
President Trump, Vice President Vance—you promised the American people an end to endless wars. You promised to put America First. You promised to stop funding genocide. Those were your words.
Yeah I’m going to need a citation on that one.
When someone bangs a member of the blue man group do you think they’re disappointed when his jizz isn’t blue?
As long as the luxury space communism is gay, I’m happy.
Also he has literally no reason to pay her and will never face a single consequence for it.
Counterpoint: gorillas are swole AF .
Say hi to Dr Mike for me.
A lot of the remainder speak at least passable English too but answer no out of spite.
Same. They should honestly thank us for it. Still paying for prime while removing the load on their servers.
Gotham chess has a video of making chatgpt play chess against stockfish. Spoiler: chatgpt does not do well. It plays okay for a few moves but then the moment it gets in trouble it straight up cheats. Telling it to follow the rules of chess doesn’t help.
This sort of gets to the heart of LLM-based “AI”. That one example to me really shows that there’s no actual reasoning happening inside. It’s producing answers that statistically look like answers that might be given based on that input.
For some things it even works. But calling this intelligence is dubious at best.
A large part of that working class is fully captive to the corporate media narratives, and voted for Trump last November. They support this.
No because statistically most of those roles will be played by Gary Oldman.
America is beyond any possible satire.
Not to mention they say “embedded” as if these goons are dodging sniper fire and mortars in Fallujah. Dude probably got his photo op and then walked over to Erewon for a $19 smoothie.
It is a distraction, but I don’t think it’s on purpose. These are just toxic people that eventually turned on each other.
This is absolutely true because Trump is fundamentally not a fluke, but rather the inevitable culmination of festering rot at the core of American culture. If not him, it would have been someone.