I used to hate android emulators, since the ones I’d tested on Windows were ad-ridden, slow bloatware.

The other day I needed to run an android app on Fedora 40.

I tried Waydroid and it worked very well. The app ran supersmooth as if it was running natively.

Also the cli syntax was very sane an user friendly.

waydroid app install|run|list …

So if you need an Android app on linux the experience might be better than what you think it would be.

  • axum@kbin.social
    8·
    7 months ago

    Maybe Wayland’s healthy place is as a secondary window system you launch inside your normal X11 session.

    Yeah you’ve got that perfectly backwards.
    Wayland allows X11 apps to open using XWayland. Not the other way around.

    Xorg’s life is running short and will be largely abandoned in the near future.

    • caseyweederman
      4·
      7 months ago

      I admire your optimism but some governments are still using floppy disks.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        7 months ago

        I know i’ve fully abandoned xorg as my primary desktop system. It now only runs things that demand running in xwayland.

        Wayland is the better desktop experience, plain and simple, especially if you have multiple monitors.

      • axum@kbin.social
        2·
        7 months ago

        I don’t see how this matters lol, as govt will happily used abandoned media and software.

        We’re here talking end users and homelabs, not IBM mainframe maintainers 😛

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      3·
      7 months ago

      I think I’d be a lot more excited about Wayland if I felt like I can get a compositor that matches my tastes.

      I want to iconify things to the desktop, not relying on a taskbar-alike. Nothing seems to offer that. Hell, the taskbar is often a third party program.

      I want to double-click to shade. Labwc just added this, a feature that X11 window managers have been offering since the 90s.

      I want an aesthetic that’s got real depth and skeumorphism, rather that flat and featureless. Maybe something offers that, but there are plenty of X11 choices that have beveled buttons out of the box.

      The charm of Unix systems used to be flexibility, buy Wayland seems to be an extinction-level event for traditional window management. Nothing fills the gap of FVWM or WindowMaker. But gosh, I can get 92 flavours of tiling compositor and windows that ripple when dragged.

      • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
        3·
        7 months ago

        The charm of Unix systems used to be flexibility, buy Wayland seems to be an extinction-level event for traditional window management. Nothing fills the gap of FVWM or WindowMaker. But gosh, I can get 92 flavours of tiling compositor and windows that ripple when dragged.

        I think this is “temporarily” true as we get more kits that make wayland development trivial I think it wont be so bad, right now wayland is still very immature, and will be for a long time.

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          1·
          7 months ago

          I wonder if it might be an unreproducible moment in history.

          I suspect the Cambrian explosion of X11 window managers came from two things:

          • Propriatery and former-propriatery systems with unique look and feel (see, for example, Open Look/olvwm) There was also a tendency to copy any style you could (WindowMaker copied NeXTStep, IceWM mocked OS/2, and when those cute QNX demo discs came out, within days there were lookalike themes). It feels like the last major outside inspirations, MacOS and Win1,1 are converging on almost intrrchangeable insipidness.

          • The 1990s/2000s customization era. Machines were finally powerful enough to do mildly nifty things, but still attainable by hobbyists gluing together pixmaps and this bred stuff like Enlightnment E16 or Afterstep

          Do these forces still exist in 2024? It seems like Unix Porn today is a bunch of neokvetch windows without even a titlebar to provide a personal statement.