A controversial bill that would require all new cars to be fitted with AM radios looks set to become a law in the near future. Yesterday, Senator Edward Markey (D-Mass) revealed that the “AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act” now has the support of 60 US Senators, as well as 246 co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, making its passage an almost sure thing. Should that happen, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration would be required to ensure that all new cars sold in the US had AM radios at no extra cost.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The argument for AM appears to be: the vast majority of adults will receive an emergency broadcast through their cellphone, but what happens if some event has already occurred which disabled large portions of the cellular network (which itself is an obvious target to create havoc)?

    I’m fine with using AM as a redundant system for alerts.

    Maybe make it more useful though for people in the car? I don’t need an AM button I’m never going to touch. Instead have it monitor whatever the emergency broadcast frequencies are automatically, and put something on screen when there is an alert. That would make it a useful “modern” feature as opposed to appearing as a legacy holdover.

    • tal@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I haven’t been following the situation, but it sounds like we haven’t even really managed to get terrestrial digital broadcast radio functioning all that well for audio. Things have kinda fragmented into three separate standards (HD Radio in the US, and Digital Audio Broadcasting and Digital Radio Mondiale in Europe).

      I think that if it’s going to reach the point of mandating inclusion of newer radios, it might be preferable to sit everyone down and come up with some kind of broadly-acceptable single standard before we start baking it into legislation.

      Also, if we’re gonna have a way of talking to the car’s computer remotely, for displaying alerts or whatnot, I’d rather that the protocol be cryptographically-secured from the get-go and that the modules be hardened as best we can. I don’t really want to deal with little Jimmy with a $10 USB radio and a laptop dicking up autos at scale.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      I disabled the emergency alerts on my phone because my provincial govt was using it like their personal Twitter account, and I can’t stand listening to the radio. I guess I’m going to find out when the tsunami just rolls over me.

      • MSids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I felt bad doing it but had to do the same for the AMBER alerts. Maine got me a few times with child abductions at 3am. Spoiler it was a domestic issue and the abductor was a family member every time. Kids were fine.

    • kent_eh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      but what happens if some event has already occurred which disabled large portions of the cellular network

      As someone who has worked as a technician in both broadcast and cellular, I can absolutely confirm that cellular networks are a lot more fragile than any type of traditional broadcast, and that AM is much more robust than any other form of broadcast.

      The transmitters are so much more simple devices, and are much easier to repair with limited resources than FM or television, should the need arise.