• M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s the main thing I don’t like about app images. It is just like windows where everything needs to be updated independently.

      • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s not true and a bit harsh. AppImage supports repos with PGP signatures and differential upgrades, neither of which is supported by Flatpak/snap or any distro repo i know of. I especially love differential upgrades, as someone who regularly has bad connection.

    • poVoq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Flatpacks don’t update themselves either, you need a system service to do that. Something similar exists for Appimages, called AppimageUpdate without requiring an appstore for it.

      • daojones@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        AppImages don’t integrate into the system at all and AppImageUpdate sucks.

        Also flatpak update go brrrr

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Appimages are well integrated in Manjaro for example. You click on it to and you automatically get the choice to have it installed with menu links and all.

          I can only assume you never properly used Appimages as they are surely better then installing a full Fedora runtime environment just to run a basic app as in the case of Flatpack.

          • daojones@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            AH really? What DE? I guess everyone should use Manjaro. For me, I have to right click, run as executable. Firefox doesn’t work, Pling icon looks like shit, can’t update them without using a poorly made updater program. No thanks!

            • poVoq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              KDE.

              Why on earth would you run Firefox via an Appimage? All these container formats are only good for apps that are not up to date / available in the distribution’s repository, and Firefox certainly is.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s the main thing I don’t like about app images. It is just like windows where everything needs to be updated independently.